Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	6	.333	0.0	6.31
8	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	.571	0.0	5.48
10	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	.667	0.0	7.84
12	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	4	.750	0.0	5.35
14	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.20	7	.143	0.0	6.05
15	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	3.50
17	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	9	.667	0.0	6.13
19	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	2	1.500	0.0	10.00
22	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	7	.714	0.0	4.73
23	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	8	.750	0.0	8.44
25	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	9	.556	0.0	7.20
27	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	2.05
29	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	9	.444	0.0	5.85
31	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	6	.333	0.0	6.43
34	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	5	.800	0.0	5.58
36	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	4	1.500	0.0	4.61
39	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	11	.273	0.0	6.48
41	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	10	.500	0.0	3.15
44	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.20	6	.167	0.0	5.15
46	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	6	.500	0.0	5.30
Total		81	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	70	0.86	129	.543	0.0	5.78

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	10	2.64	14	0	1.000	0.0	6.31
8	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	2.17	12	0	1.000	0.0	5.48
10	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	10	2.64	14	0	1.000	0.0	7.84
12	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	14	2.38	21	2	.905	0.0	5.35
14	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	14	2.32	25	0	1.000	0.0	6.05
15	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	3	2.00	8	0	1.000	0.0	3.50
17	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	14	2.35	23	1	.957	0.0	6.13
19	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	4.33	7	2.55	11	0	1.000	0.0	10.00
22	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	10	2.35	17	0	1.000	0.0	4.73
23	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	10	2.37	19	0	1.000	0.0	8.44
25	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	15	2.50	22	0	1.000	0.0	7.20
27	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	1.75	12	2	.833	0.0	2.05
29	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	8	2.07	15	3	.800	0.0	5.85
31	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	2.67	9	0	1.000	0.0	6.43
34	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	9	2.41	17	0	1.000	0.0	5.58
36	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	9	2.21	19	0	1.000	0.0	4.61
39	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	11	1.96	26	3	.885	0.0	6.48
41	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	12	2.03	30	2	.933	0.0	3.15
44	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	19	2.22	32	4	.875	0.0	5.15
46	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	20	2.25	36	2	.944	0.0	5.30
Total		81	.	.	.	.	.	132	1.63	211	2.27	382	19	.950	0.0	5.78