Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	2	0.25	9	.778	6	1.50	11	.545	1.0	5.98
2	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	4	0.80	9	.444	0.0	4.70
4	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	11	.545	0.0	4.95
5	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	2	1.000	0.0	3.50
7	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	10	.200	0.0	2.50
8	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	5	.600	0.0	5.80
10	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	10	.600	0.0	6.83
11	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	2	3	0.67	9	.667	0	0.00	1	.000	2.0	4.30
13	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	10	.700	0.0	5.96
15	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	8	.500	0.0	4.90
17	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	.833	0.0	3.65
19	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	7	.714	0.0	4.03
21	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	14	.429	0.0	6.30
22	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	5.30
29	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	11	.545	0.0	5.40
30	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	0	0.33	7	1.000	4	1.33	10	.400	1.0	2.75
34	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	7	.429	0.0	5.80
38	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.20	5	.200	0.0	8.36
39	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	6.50
40	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	13	.385	0.0	6.06
44	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	5.38
45	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	11	.636	0.0	6.35
Total		88	.	.	.	.	.	10	4	7	0.05	39	.821	88	1.00	175	.503	4.0	5.24

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	11	2.24	21	0	1.000	1.0	5.98
2	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	17	2.29	31	1	.968	0.0	4.70
4	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	11	2.12	26	0	1.000	0.0	4.95
5	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	2.25	12	1	.917	0.0	3.50
7	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	9	1.95	20	3	.850	0.0	2.50
8	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	14	2.26	31	1	.968	0.0	5.80
10	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	8	2.40	15	1	.933	0.0	6.83
11	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	9	2.43	14	0	1.000	2.0	4.30
13	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	2.43	14	1	.929	0.0	5.96
15	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	7	2.22	18	0	1.000	0.0	4.90
17	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	2.29	14	0	1.000	0.0	3.65
19	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	11	2.00	21	3	.857	0.0	4.03
21	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	16	2.50	28	0	1.000	0.0	6.30
22	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	7	2.21	14	1	.929	0.0	5.30
29	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	11	2.26	23	0	1.000	0.0	5.40
30	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	2	2.00	8	0	1.000	1.0	2.75
34	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	9	2.50	14	0	1.000	0.0	5.80
38	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	14	2.80	18	2.64	25	0	1.000	0.0	8.36
39	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	12	2.59	17	0	1.000	0.0	6.50
40	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	11	2.53	17	0	1.000	0.0	6.06
44	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	4	1.89	9	1	.889	0.0	5.38
45	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	8	2.31	16	0	1.000	0.0	6.35
Total		88	.	.	.	.	.	155	1.76	218	2.30	408	13	.968	4.0	5.24