Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	10	.200	0.0	6.15
3	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	4	.250	0.0	6.05
4	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	8	.875	4	1.00	9	.444	0.0	7.65
6	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.20	12	.833	6	1.20	13	.462	1.0	8.29
10	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	1	0.00	9	.889	6	2.00	7	.857	0.0	7.02
11	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	4	1.33	6	.667	1.0	7.16
14	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	3	0.00	14	.786	7	2.33	7	1.000	0.0	7.41
16	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	7.91
19	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	10	.500	0.0	6.98
20	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	6	.500	0.0	5.35
21	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.33	10	.800	7	2.33	8	.875	1.0	5.51
22	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	3	0.50	17	.824	3	0.75	6	.500	2.0	8.45
25	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	.556	0.0	6.21
26	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	8	1.000	0.0	4.23
30	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	16	.563	0.0	8.28
32	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	4.72
34	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	6.65
35	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	.375	0.0	4.95
39	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	3	.667	0.0	4.75
40	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	7	.571	0.0	4.95
44	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	2	.500	0.0	9.25
45	Merritt Island L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	16	.688	0.0	7.61
Total		80	.	.	.	.	.	39	5	15	0.06	100	.850	98	1.23	168	.583	5.0	6.62

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	14	2.31	26	2	.923	0.0	6.15
3	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	9	2.16	19	1	.947	0.0	6.05
4	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	11	2.43	21	0	1.000	0.0	7.65
6	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	14	2.58	19	1	.947	1.0	8.29
10	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	8	2.29	14	0	1.000	0.0	7.02
11	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	13	2.42	19	1	.947	1.0	7.16
14	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	8	1.94	17	1	.941	0.0	7.41
16	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	9	2.33	18	0	1.000	0.0	7.91
19	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	16	2.71	21	0	1.000	0.0	6.98
20	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	5	2.13	16	0	1.000	0.0	5.35
21	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	2	2.00	5	1	.800	1.0	5.51
22	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	13	2.40	25	1	.960	2.0	8.45
25	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	2.55	11	0	1.000	0.0	6.21
26	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	2.27	15	1	.933	0.0	4.23
30	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	17	2.61	23	0	1.000	0.0	8.28
32	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	9	2.38	16	1	.938	0.0	4.72
34	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	8	2.43	14	0	1.000	0.0	6.65
35	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	6	1.88	16	2	.875	0.0	4.95
39	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	14	2.24	29	1	.966	0.0	4.75
40	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	11	2.17	23	2	.913	0.0	4.95
44	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	11	2.50	16	1	.938	0.0	9.25
45	Merritt Island L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	12	2.47	17	0	1.000	0.0	7.61
Total		80	.	.	.	.	.	159	1.99	227	2.34	400	16	.960	5.0	6.62