Players

Kai Simpson 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	15	16	14	12	8

Career Honors

S53rd All-TMVL1st All-SEC

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	5	25	.120	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.25
3	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	4	23	.304	10	2	2	0.67	17	.882	1	0.33	1	1.000	14.5	7.87
4	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	25	5.00	4	33	.636	9	1	1	0.20	18	.944	.	.	.	.	27.0	8.57
6	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	15	5.00	4	32	.344	1	1	2	0.33	7	.714	2	0.67	1	2.000	16.0	6.91
8	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	22	4.40	12	44	.227	5	1	2	0.20	16	.875	.	.	.	.	24.5	7.61
9	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	10	48	.208	5	0	3	0.00	15	.800	.	.	.	.	24.0	8.78
11	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	4	21	.429	8	2	3	0.67	15	.800	0	0.00	2	.000	15.5	7.59
12	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	4	25	.320	4	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.30
14	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	0	24	.583	4	2	4	0.67	10	.600	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.44
15	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	21	5.25	9	37	.324	7	2	2	0.50	15	.867	0	0.00	1	.000	23.5	8.13
17	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	6	34	.353	11	3	1	0.75	19	.947	.	.	.	.	21.5	7.91
18	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	8	28	.143	3	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	0	0.00	2	.000	14.0	7.51
21	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	19	6.33	3	23	.696	6	3	1	1.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	23.5	9.29
25	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	23	4.60	8	39	.385	3	1	2	0.20	15	.867	0	0.00	2	.000	27.0	8.11
26	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	4	30	.367	5	1	2	0.33	8	.750	.	.	.	.	18.5	8.42
29	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	20	6.67	2	33	.545	6	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	21.0	8.93
30	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	4	27	.296	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	1	0.33	2	.500	13.0	7.91
34	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	9	24	-.042	7	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.58
40	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	4	31	.419	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	20.0	9.04
Total		69	305	4.42	104	581	.346	100	20	36	0.29	241	.851	11	0.16	11	1.000	355.5	7.80

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	7	2.33	12	2.29	24	0	1.000	11.0	7.25
3	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	13	2.07	27	3	.889	14.5	7.87
4	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	10	2.00	17	2.20	35	2	.943	27.0	8.57
6	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	12	2.14	21	2	.905	16.0	6.91
8	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	2	0.40	8	1.60	17	2.15	33	2	.939	24.5	7.61
9	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	0	8	8	0	1.60	13	2.60	19	2.25	36	1	.972	24.0	8.78
11	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	7	1.94	17	3	.824	15.5	7.59
12	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	13	1.87	30	4	.867	13.0	5.30
14	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	9	2.10	20	3	.850	16.5	7.44
15	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	6	1.50	14	2.11	36	2	.944	23.5	8.13
17	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	14	3.50	10	1.97	31	2	.935	21.5	7.91
18	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	1	0.33	15	2.15	27	3	.889	14.0	7.51
21	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	10	2.33	18	2	.889	23.5	9.29
25	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	5	1.00	18	2.24	34	1	.971	27.0	8.11
26	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	10	2.14	22	1	.955	18.5	8.42
29	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	14	2.25	24	2	.917	21.0	8.93
30	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	12	2.33	21	1	.952	13.0	7.91
34	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	10	1.67	27	7	.741	11.5	5.58
40	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	10	2.50	24	2.69	32	0	1.000	20.0	9.04
Total		69	4	53	57	5	0.83	109	1.58	256	2.16	515	41	.920	355.5	7.80