Players

Ryker Mason 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	16	16	15	13	6

Career Honors

S52nd All-SEC

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	2	22	.545	3	2	2	0.67	12	.833	.	.	.	.	18.5	8.68
3	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	4	30	.400	10	2	3	0.50	19	.842	.	.	.	.	19.0	8.50
4	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	6	31	.355	6	1	6	0.25	16	.625	0	0.00	1	.000	18.5	8.31
5	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	2	27	.556	4	1	0	0.25	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	18.5	8.00
7	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	21	.429	1	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.24
9	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	7	23	.130	2	1	2	0.33	11	.818	2	0.67	3	.667	11.5	7.15
10	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	8	22	.045	7	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.30
11	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	24	6.00	2	35	.629	2	0	3	0.00	12	.750	1	0.25	1	1.000	25.5	8.27
13	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	14	.429	5	1	3	0.33	13	.769	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.00
14	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	1	18	.389	4	0	3	0.00	17	.824	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.53
17	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	18	4.50	5	29	.448	6	0	0	0.00	16	1.000	1	0.25	1	1.000	19.0	8.18
19	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	4	26	.462	7	1	1	0.25	18	.944	.	.	.	.	20.0	7.90
21	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	20	5.00	1	23	.826	9	1	1	0.25	18	.944	.	.	.	.	25.0	9.09
26	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	9	38	.211	5	1	3	0.20	17	.824	.	.	.	.	20.5	6.97
29	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	1	15	.800	6	1	0	0.33	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.21
31	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	8	34	.235	10	2	0	0.40	24	1.000	.	.	.	.	20.0	7.10
36	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	5	21	.333	3	1	1	0.33	10	.900	0	0.00	1	.000	15.0	8.39
39	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	14	.286	7	0	0	0.00	15	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	9.0	5.69
44	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	3	22	.455	5	1	2	0.25	17	.882	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.65
Total		72	267	3.71	76	465	.411	102	16	34	0.22	289	.882	7	0.10	8	.875	316.5	7.53

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	5	1.67	5	2.20	10	0	1.000	18.5	8.68
3	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	8	2.00	10	2.22	18	1	.944	19.0	8.50
4	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	11	2.39	18	0	1.000	18.5	8.31
5	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	13	2.57	21	0	1.000	18.5	8.00
7	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	5	1.25	11	2.32	19	2	.895	16.0	7.24
9	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	9	2.64	11	1	.909	11.5	7.15
10	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	12	2.59	17	0	1.000	9.5	7.30
11	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	1	0.25	12	2.44	18	0	1.000	25.5	8.27
13	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	13	2.21	29	1	.966	9.0	6.00
14	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	3	0.60	19	2.43	28	2	.929	10.5	4.53
17	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	13	2.25	24	1	.958	19.0	8.18
19	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	.	.	13	2.18	28	3	.893	20.0	7.90
21	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	2	4	6	0	1.50	4	1.00	16	2.26	31	3	.903	25.0	9.09
26	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	2	0.40	17	2.33	33	1	.970	20.5	6.97
29	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	10	2.28	18	1	.944	15.0	8.21
31	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	19	2.21	39	1	.974	20.0	7.10
36	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	9	2.47	15	0	1.000	15.0	8.39
39	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	3	1.00	8	2.31	13	1	.923	9.0	5.69
44	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	2	0.50	15	2.48	21	0	1.000	16.5	7.65
Total		72	3	61	64	2	0.89	65	0.90	235	2.34	411	18	.956	316.5	7.53