Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	8	.375	4	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.98
3	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	11	.364	11	1	2	0.25	18	.889	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.40
4	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	5	17	.059	11	2	2	0.50	20	.900	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.30
5	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	5	19	.263	6	1	4	0.25	15	.733	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.11
7	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	3	16	.250	2	0	4	0.00	12	.667	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.46
9	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	11	.636	8	1	2	0.33	16	.875	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.01
10	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	3	.333	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	5.0	7.05
11	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	14	.500	8	1	3	0.25	18	.833	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.25
13	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	5	12	-.333	1	1	1	0.33	7	.857	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.71
14	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	2	21	.286	9	1	0	0.20	18	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.83
17	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	3	14	.143	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.85
21	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	3	12	.167	8	1	1	0.25	16	.938	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.10
26	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	2	14	.214	12	3	4	0.60	22	.818	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.95
29	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	5	.400	4	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.30
31	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	4	13	-.077	4	2	6	0.40	14	.571	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.21
36	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	6	11	-.455	3	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.47
39	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	8	.750	4	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.98
44	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	21	.286	5	1	0	0.25	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.68
Total		68	97	1.43	48	230	.213	104	17	38	0.25	251	.849	.	.	.	.	144.0	6.37

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.98
3	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.40
4	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.30
5	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.11
7	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	1	1.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.46
9	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.01
10	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	2	2	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	7.05
11	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.25
13	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	2	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.71
14	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	1	0.60	11	2.20	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.83
17	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	1	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.85
21	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.10
26	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.95
29	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.30
31	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.21
36	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.47
39	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.98
44	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.68
Total		68	6	48	54	8	0.79	88	1.29	.	.	.	.	.	144.0	6.37