Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	4	23	.304	1	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.08
4	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	5	21	.190	1	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.70
7	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	10	30	.033	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.94
11	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	11	20	-.350	2	1	3	0.33	7	.571	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.94
13	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	15	.067	0	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.36
18	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	6	17	-.294	3	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.34
21	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	10	.300	6	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.40
25	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	5	25	.120	2	0	5	0.00	8	.375	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.12
30	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	4	30	.367	5	1	2	0.20	14	.857	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.39
39	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	17	.000	1	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.28
44	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	6	25	.200	4	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.72
Total		35	84	2.40	61	233	.099	27	3	16	0.09	91	.824	.	.	.	.	91.5	4.84

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.08
4	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.70
7	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.94
11	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.94
13	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.36
18	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.34
21	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.40
25	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.12
30	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.39
39	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.28
44	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.72
Total		35	0	9	9	1	0.26	29	0.83	.	.	.	.	.	91.5	4.84