Players

Julian Mckinney 6 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	14	14	15	15	3

Career Honors

S12nd All-TMVL1st All-PAC-8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	1	18	.667	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.37
3	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	2	22	.727	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	21.0	6.81
5	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	3	26	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.88
6	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	18	3.60	5	31	.419	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.63
7	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	10	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.17
10	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	6	28	.357	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	20.5	7.40
11	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	21	4.20	5	35	.457	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	22.0	6.51
12	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	5	29	.414	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	8.24
14	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	4	30	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.81
15	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	20	5.00	1	30	.633	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	21.5	8.95
19	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	16	.188	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.56
20	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	10	.700	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.86
21	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	10	24	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.77
24	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	22	.364	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.95
25	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	20	.450	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.80
28	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	21	5.25	5	40	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	22.5	6.62
29	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	19	6.33	4	26	.577	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	20.0	7.98
30	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	18	3.60	5	37	.351	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	21.0	7.53
31	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	3	33	.394	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	9.24
32	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	7	31	.226	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.01
33	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	20	.100	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	2.96
34	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	18	.611	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.83
Total		82	309	3.77	80	556	.412	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	364.5	7.22

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	1	0.33	5	1.67	NA	NA	16	4	.750	14.0	6.37
3	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	4	1.00	NA	NA	29	5	.828	21.0	6.81
5	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	8	2.67	NA	NA	16	1	.938	17.0	8.88
6	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	NA	NA	33	2	.939	19.0	7.63
7	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	4	1.33	NA	NA	24	2	.917	9.5	5.17
10	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	1	5	6	0	1.50	12	3.00	NA	NA	36	5	.861	20.5	7.40
11	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	NA	NA	42	5	.881	22.0	6.51
12	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	13	2.60	NA	NA	30	1	.967	19.0	8.24
14	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	11	2.75	NA	NA	35	3	.914	17.5	7.81
15	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	NA	NA	22	1	.955	21.5	8.95
19	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	NA	NA	21	2	.905	10.5	5.56
20	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	7	2.33	NA	NA	19	0	1.000	13.5	7.86
21	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	8	8	0	2.67	5	1.67	NA	NA	20	2	.900	14.0	6.77
24	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	1	0.67	5	1.67	NA	NA	13	0	1.000	11.5	6.95
25	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	NA	NA	27	0	1.000	11.5	7.80
28	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	3	0.75	NA	NA	36	6	.833	22.5	6.62
29	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	NA	NA	24	2	.917	20.0	7.98
30	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	NA	NA	39	3	.923	21.0	7.53
31	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	1	0.75	7	1.75	NA	NA	22	0	1.000	19.0	9.24
32	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	NA	NA	35	3	.914	16.0	7.01
33	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	3	0.75	NA	NA	32	5	.844	8.5	2.96
34	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	9	3.00	NA	NA	18	1	.944	15.5	8.83
Total		82	6	55	61	5	0.74	141	1.72	0	0.00	589	53	.910	364.5	7.22