Players

Colin Patel 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
10	-	14	11	4	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	10	.200	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.03
7	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	13	.077	3	1	2	0.33	9	.778	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.18
9	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	13	.231	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.14
10	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	7	.571	3	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.87
12	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	6	17	.059	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.19
14	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	4	11	.273	5	3	3	0.75	14	.786	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.44
15	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	7	16	.000	7	4	3	1.00	14	.786	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.59
18	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	4	24	.458	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.64
19	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	9	.556	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.36
21	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	16	.188	4	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.38
22	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	7	.429	0	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.40
25	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	3	19	.526	4	0	2	0.00	18	.889	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.99
32	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	13	.615	3	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.62
36	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	4	12	-.167	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.46
39	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	2	17	.471	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.54
44	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	10	.300	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.23
Total		60	110	1.83	47	214	.294	37	9	23	0.15	121	.810	.	.	.	.	144.0	5.32

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	1	5	6	0	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.03
7	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.18
9	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.14
10	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.87
12	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.19
14	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.44
15	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.59
18	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.64
19	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.36
21	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.38
22	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.40
25	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	1	1.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.99
32	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.62
36	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.46
39	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.54
44	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	1	5	6	0	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.23
Total		60	5	40	45	4	0.75	5	0.08	.	.	.	.	.	144.0	5.32