Players

Benedict Bartlett 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	14	15	8	-

Career Honors

S32nd All-TMVL1st All-PAC-8

S42nd All-PAC-8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	10	.400	5	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	9.0	8.11
4	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	15	.667	4	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.81
6	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	4	20	.550	11	1	2	0.25	19	.895	.	.	.	.	21.0	10.00
7	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	4	26	.615	4	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	21.0	6.47
8	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	14	.571	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.44
12	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	6	12	-.083	2	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.13
13	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	4	18	.500	10	2	3	0.40	22	.864	.	.	.	.	16.0	5.84
16	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	4	16	.438	5	1	3	0.20	16	.813	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.80
18	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	11	.636	2	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.53
20	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	4	20	.600	3	0	3	0.00	15	.800	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.95
21	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	9	.333	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.75
24	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	12	.333	9	3	1	1.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.51
25	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	7	16	.000	9	0	5	0.00	19	.737	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.66
29	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	11	.273	6	3	2	0.75	18	.889	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.64
32	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	13	.462	10	4	3	1.00	20	.850	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.12
33	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	5	.600	4	2	2	0.67	10	.800	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.10
36	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	5	18	.389	6	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	15.5	10.00
37	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	1	13	.769	4	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.75
41	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	2	10	.600	10	3	1	0.60	23	.957	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.27
42	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	4	17	.353	4	0	2	0.00	16	.875	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.08
Total		75	196	2.61	65	286	.458	113	23	36	0.31	293	.877	.	.	.	.	246.0	6.30

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	8.11
4	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.81
6	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	2	6	8	1	2.00	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	21.0	10.00
7	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	21.0	6.47
8	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.44
12	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.13
13	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0	1	0	0.20	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	5.84
16	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.80
18	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.53
20	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.95
21	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.75
24	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.51
25	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.66
29	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	2	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.64
32	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.12
33	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.10
36	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	5	6	2	2.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	10.00
37	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.75
41	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.27
42	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.08
Total		75	6	42	48	9	0.64	36	0.48	.	.	.	.	.	246.0	6.30