Players

Avery Arnold 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	12	13	13	11	8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	23	.348	4	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.78
6	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	3	20	.200	3	2	2	0.40	14	.857	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	4.40
7	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	4	20	.500	7	0	1	0.00	17	.941	1	0.25	1	1.000	16.0	7.14
9	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	7	27	.370	10	2	1	0.40	20	.950	2	0.40	2	1.000	19.5	6.79
10	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	18	.333	7	1	2	0.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.91
12	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	14	.357	3	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.91
13	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	25	.280	8	2	2	0.50	20	.900	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.34
16	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	13	.538	12	5	2	1.25	24	.917	.	.	.	.	14.0	3.71
19	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	2	26	.423	4	1	5	0.20	16	.688	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.14
20	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	15	.667	8	2	2	0.67	15	.867	.	.	.	.	14.5	8.69
22	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	3	23	.478	4	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	15.5	5.32
24	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	14	.571	4	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.29
25	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	9	19	-.211	2	1	0	0.33	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.5	2.93
28	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	19	.368	4	1	1	0.25	15	.933	.	.	.	.	11.5	3.49
29	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	2	17	.471	3	1	3	0.20	13	.769	0	0.00	2	.000	11.0	3.22
33	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	2	25	.520	11	0	1	0.00	21	.952	0	0.00	1	.000	15.5	6.20
38	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	0	18	.611	4	0	4	0.00	14	.714	0	0.00	1	.000	13.5	6.56
39	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	1	14	.643	6	2	4	0.50	15	.733	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.60
41	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	4	25	.400	4	1	5	0.25	15	.667	0	0.00	1	.000	17.0	6.76
Total		77	208	2.70	57	375	.403	108	21	41	0.27	289	.858	3	0.04	9	.333	260.0	5.75

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	1	1.75	4	1.00	10	1.92	25	2	.920	14.5	5.78
6	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	0	8	8	0	1.60	4	0.80	20	2.31	35	2	.943	13.0	4.40
7	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	7	1.75	6	1.94	18	1	.944	16.0	7.14
9	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	7	1.40	17	2.15	34	2	.941	19.5	6.79
10	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	4	1.33	7	1.94	18	2	.889	13.0	6.91
12	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	8	1.95	19	2	.895	10.0	5.91
13	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	10	2.50	13	2.10	30	1	.967	13.5	6.34
16	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	12	1.90	29	4	.862	14.0	3.71
19	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	20	2.18	38	3	.921	14.5	5.14
20	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	2	0.33	6	2.00	11	2.37	19	0	1.000	14.5	8.69
22	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	1	0.20	15	2.15	33	1	.970	15.5	5.32
24	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	5	1.67	12	2.23	22	1	.955	14.0	8.29
25	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	10	2.04	23	2	.913	6.5	2.93
28	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	1	0.50	3	0.75	10	1.63	30	6	.800	11.5	3.49
29	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	20	2.15	40	3	.925	11.0	3.22
33	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	7	1.40	17	2.00	43	5	.884	15.5	6.20
38	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	5	1.25	16	2.22	32	2	.938	13.5	6.56
39	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	18	2.15	34	4	.882	13.0	5.60
41	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	10	2.50	11	1.84	31	6	.806	17.0	6.76
Total		77	1	60	61	6	0.79	95	1.23	253	2.07	553	49	.911	260.0	5.75