Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	3	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.95
5	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.69
8	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	3	14	.143	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.18
9	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	5	13	-.308	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.40
13	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	6	21	.095	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.02
15	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	6	16	-.188	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.44
17	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	6	-.167	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.92
18	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	6	10	-.200	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	1.83
21	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	3	9	.111	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.79
23	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	6	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.35
25	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	11	.273	3	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.62
Total		40	36	0.90	37	115	-.009	8	1	0	0.03	25	1.000	.	.	.	.	53.5	3.56

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.95
5	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.69
8	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.18
9	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.40
13	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.02
15	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	2	5	7	1	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.44
17	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.92
18	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	1.83
21	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	1	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.79
23	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.35
25	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.62
Total		40	5	23	28	6	0.70	2	0.05	.	.	.	.	.	53.5	3.56