Players

Anthony Peters 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	15	-	-	15	13

Season 8 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
178 9th	2.46 5th	.969 13th	88 78th	5 331st

Career Honors

S82nd All-PAC-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	4	0.00	12	.667	3	0.60	6	.500	0.0	9.06
3	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	3	1.00	7	.429	0.0	8.58
4	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	2	2	0.67	15	.867	3	1.00	5	.600	2.0	9.72
6	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	5	.800	0.0	7.86
7	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	6	.500	0.0	6.03
9	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	2	.000	0.0	4.15
10	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	8	.625	0.0	6.06
12	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	9	.667	0.0	6.38
14	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	.429	0.0	5.61
15	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	.571	0.0	8.67
19	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	11	.545	0.0	6.72
20	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	4.18
22	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	9	.667	0.0	7.23
23	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	10	.900	0.0	4.10
25	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	3	2	1.00	15	.867	3	1.00	6	.500	3.0	5.49
26	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	7	.714	0.0	6.53
29	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	4	.750	0.0	6.48
32	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	5	.800	0.0	6.93
34	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	4.26
37	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	3	.667	0.0	5.43
39	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	8	.500	0.0	5.83
42	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	9	.222	0.0	3.85
44	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	7	.429	0.0	4.80
47	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	2	1.000	0.0	6.55
Total		93	.	.	.	.	.	18	5	9	0.05	48	.813	88	0.95	150	.587	5.0	6.27

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	25	5.00	10	2.38	16	0	1.000	0.0	9.06
3	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	5	2.50	10	0	1.000	0.0	8.58
4	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	12	2.56	18	0	1.000	2.0	9.72
6	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	14	2.71	17	0	1.000	0.0	7.86
7	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	9	2.47	17	0	1.000	0.0	6.03
9	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	2.17	12	1	.917	0.0	4.15
10	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	15	2.55	20	0	1.000	0.0	6.06
12	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	2.40	10	1	.900	0.0	6.38
14	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	2.46	13	1	.923	0.0	5.61
15	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	10	2.75	12	0	1.000	0.0	8.67
19	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	2.75	8	0	1.000	0.0	6.72
20	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	16	2.36	25	1	.960	0.0	4.18
22	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	12	2.63	16	0	1.000	0.0	7.23
23	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	11	2.21	24	1	.958	0.0	4.10
25	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	13	2.56	18	0	1.000	3.0	5.49
26	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	11	2.47	17	1	.941	0.0	6.53
29	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	13	2.45	22	0	1.000	0.0	6.48
32	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	17	2.70	23	0	1.000	0.0	6.93
34	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	4	2.38	8	0	1.000	0.0	4.26
37	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	13	2.72	18	0	1.000	0.0	5.43
39	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	6	1.93	15	3	.800	0.0	5.83
42	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	10	2.17	18	2	.889	0.0	3.85
44	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	13	2.41	22	1	.955	0.0	4.80
47	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	8	2.50	12	0	1.000	0.0	6.55
Total		93	.	.	.	.	.	178	1.91	250	2.46	391	12	.969	5.0	6.27