Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	2	0.33	7	.714	1	0.33	6	.167	1.0	8.38
2	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	1	2	0.25	16	.875	2	0.50	4	.500	1.0	8.06
6	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	10	.300	0.0	4.50
9	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	2	5	0.40	17	.706	7	1.40	4	1.750	2.0	7.41
11	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	3	0.25	14	.786	2	0.50	8	.250	1.0	4.15
15	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	1	4	0.20	27	.852	0	0.00	10	.000	1.0	7.98
26	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	2	0.00	15	.867	2	0.50	6	.333	0.0	8.29
30	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	0	0.25	15	1.000	2	0.50	2	1.000	1.0	6.98
Total		32	.	.	.	.	.	41	7	18	0.22	111	.838	19	0.59	50	.380	7.0	6.97

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	16	5.33	9	2.16	19	1	.947	1.0	8.38
2	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	14	3.50	8	2.24	21	0	1.000	1.0	8.06
6	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	5	1.80	15	2	.867	0.0	4.50
9	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	14	2.40	25	0	1.000	2.0	7.41
11	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	15	2.31	29	0	1.000	1.0	4.15
15	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	25	5.00	14	1.96	28	5	.821	1.0	7.98
26	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	15	2.40	25	1	.960	0.0	8.29
30	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	17	2.34	29	1	.966	1.0	6.98
Total		32	.	.	.	.	.	95	2.97	97	2.23	191	10	.948	7.0	6.97