Players

Emiliano Guzman 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	15	10	10	15

Season 5 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
984 11th	19 350th	21 73rd	82 141st	52 146th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 5)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	4	.250	5	1	5	0.25	17	.706	53	13.25	96	.552	4.0	8.92
3	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	2	6	-.333	4	0	4	0.00	15	.733	48	12.00	86	.558	0.0	5.78
8	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	9	.444	4	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	41	13.67	60	.683	6.0	9.15
9	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	9	0	3	0.00	16	.813	32	10.67	48	.667	2.0	6.68
10	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	2	.000	3	0	5	0.00	15	.667	49	12.25	86	.570	2.5	7.65
11	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	5	0	2	0.00	12	.833	43	14.33	58	.741	1.0	9.47
14	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	4	9	-.333	7	0	3	0.00	18	.833	63	12.60	91	.692	1.5	7.50
15	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	13	2	0	0.50	21	1.000	49	12.25	87	.563	3.5	8.18
17	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	5	1	2	0.33	13	.846	28	9.33	48	.583	2.0	5.23
19	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	2	1	3	0.33	11	.727	29	9.67	48	.604	1.0	3.52
21	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	6	.500	16	3	3	1.00	23	.870	36	12.00	59	.610	7.5	8.75
22	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	9	2	4	0.67	18	.778	43	14.33	71	.606	2.0	8.89
25	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	6	.167	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	39	13.00	61	.639	3.0	8.43
26	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	2	.000	7	1	1	0.25	16	.938	52	13.00	90	.578	3.0	9.13
30	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	6	.000	1	0	2	0.00	15	.867	58	11.60	95	.611	2.5	6.24
33	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	38	12.67	71	.535	1.5	6.94
34	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	0	0.33	7	1.000	36	12.00	67	.537	2.5	6.19
35	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	3	.333	9	3	1	0.60	15	.933	49	9.80	99	.495	6.0	6.16
39	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	7	-.286	4	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	37	12.33	62	.597	1.0	7.99
40	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	6	.167	6	1	2	0.20	19	.895	59	11.80	93	.634	5.5	7.61
44	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	2	.500	6	3	3	0.75	20	.850	48	12.00	75	.640	6.0	7.36
45	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	6	.000	8	2	6	0.50	20	.700	54	13.50	72	.750	4.5	9.35
Total		81	19	0.23	14	97	.052	127	21	52	0.26	334	.844	984	12.15	1623	.606	68.5	7.51

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 5)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	8.92
3	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	5.78
8	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	9.15
9	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.68
10	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.65
11	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	10	3.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	9.47
14	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	7.50
15	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	8.18
17	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.23
19	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.52
21	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	8.75
22	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.89
25	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.43
26	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	9.13
30	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.24
33	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	6.94
34	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.19
35	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	9	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.16
39	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	7.99
40	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	7.61
44	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	7.36
45	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	9.35
Total		81	5	47	52	3	0.64	82	1.01	.	.	.	.	.	68.5	7.51