Players

Emiliano Guzman 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	15	10	10	15

Season 6 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
956 13th	37 308th	30 27th	90 106th	46 179th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 6)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	2	.000	15	1	1	0.25	21	.952	36	9.00	89	.404	3.0	5.93
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	36	12.00	84	.429	3.0	7.72
4	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	31	10.33	59	.525	2.0	6.21
6	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	4	0	4	0.00	13	.692	30	10.00	51	.588	3.5	6.30
7	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	2	6	-.167	10	2	2	0.50	19	.895	47	11.75	87	.540	4.5	7.57
9	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	6	.333	4	1	2	0.33	12	.833	33	11.00	67	.493	3.5	5.70
10	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	5	-.200	8	2	3	0.50	19	.842	50	12.50	80	.625	3.0	7.76
12	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	7	4	1	1.33	13	.923	36	12.00	50	.720	4.0	7.00
13	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	7	.429	10	2	2	0.67	16	.875	32	10.67	44	.727	7.0	7.79
16	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	0	5	.800	2	0	0	0.00	16	1.000	53	10.60	99	.535	5.5	5.58
17	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	6	.500	8	1	2	0.25	18	.889	49	12.25	95	.516	4.5	8.24
19	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	39	13.00	68	.574	1.0	7.40
21	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	46	15.33	77	.597	2.0	8.63
22	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	8	2	2	0.40	22	.909	62	12.40	105	.590	4.5	7.94
31	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	3	.333	12	4	5	0.80	25	.800	57	11.40	108	.528	5.5	6.68
32	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	5	.600	3	2	2	0.50	15	.867	53	13.25	83	.639	7.5	8.86
34	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	6	.167	4	2	1	0.67	13	.923	35	11.67	63	.556	5.5	7.50
37	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	1	0	1	0.00	10	.900	44	14.67	75	.587	0.5	7.30
39	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	4	1	2	0.33	13	.846	35	11.67	65	.538	3.5	6.98
41	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	0	6	.833	5	1	3	0.25	18	.833	50	12.50	87	.575	8.0	8.66
44	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	6	.500	7	2	5	0.50	19	.737	56	14.00	86	.651	7.0	9.83
46	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	6	.333	3	1	2	0.25	12	.833	46	11.50	90	.511	4.0	6.58
Total		80	37	0.46	7	96	.313	125	30	44	0.38	336	.869	956	11.95	1712	.558	92.5	7.37

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 6)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.93
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	7.72
4	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.21
6	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.30
7	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.57
9	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.70
10	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	7.76
12	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.00
13	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	9	3.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.79
16	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	2	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.58
17	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	8.24
19	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	7.40
21	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.63
22	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.94
31	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.68
32	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	2	1	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	8.86
34	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	7.50
37	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	7.30
39	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.98
41	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	8.66
44	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	9.83
46	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.58
Total		80	5	41	46	4	0.58	90	1.13	.	.	.	.	.	92.5	7.37