Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	11	.091	1	1	2	0.33	7	.714	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.55
4	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	18	.278	12	2	2	0.40	22	.909	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.86
6	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	10	.100	4	2	2	0.67	10	.800	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.20
9	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	6	22	.000	5	1	1	0.20	12	.917	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.70
12	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	9	.111	8	3	3	1.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.14
14	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	20	.250	8	1	1	0.25	16	.938	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.73
19	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	17	.294	5	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.08
23	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.69
29	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	9	.222	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.56
44	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	0	13	.385	6	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.13
45	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	3	9	.000	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.44
Total		40	57	1.43	31	142	.183	53	10	14	0.25	126	.889	.	.	.	.	75.5	4.92

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.55
4	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.86
6	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.20
9	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.70
12	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.14
14	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.73
19	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.08
23	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.69
29	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.56
44	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.13
45	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.44
Total		40	1	15	16	1	0.40	46	1.15	.	.	.	.	.	75.5	4.92