Players

Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 5 hours and 3 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 12:56:43 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Kameron Williamson 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	12	14	14	16	9

Season 6 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
193 94th	.354 124th	23 65th	91 102nd	35 242nd

Career Honors

S52nd All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 6)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	5	32	.344	1	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.46
3	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	1	24	.625	7	2	0	0.67	14	1.000	4	1.33	1	4.000	19.0	9.55
5	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	4	21	.286	8	1	2	0.20	23	.913	.	.	.	.	12.5	3.91
6	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	5	26	.385	5	0	1	0.00	13	.923	1	0.25	1	1.000	16.0	7.58
9	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	3	24	.375	5	1	0	0.25	17	1.000	0	0.00	2	.000	14.5	5.88
12	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	5	25	.280	21	4	3	1.00	30	.900	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.48
15	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	6	19	.158	7	3	2	1.00	16	.875	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.05
16	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	7	24	.125	3	1	2	0.25	15	.867	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.15
19	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	1	21	.619	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	2	0.67	2	1.000	14.5	7.35
23	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	5	19	.368	3	2	1	0.67	12	.917	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.16
33	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	5	27	.370	12	2	5	0.40	25	.800	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.52
34	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	6	27	.148	6	0	3	0.00	17	.824	0	0.00	2	.000	12.5	6.24
38	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	15	.400	10	1	2	0.25	21	.905	0	0.00	2	.000	10.5	4.49
43	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	6	24	.417	12	2	2	0.50	24	.917	1	0.25	1	1.000	18.0	7.51
44	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	13	.538	9	3	2	1.00	15	.867	0	0.00	2	.000	14.5	7.50
46	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	18	.333	6	1	1	0.33	15	.933	0	0.00	1	.000	10.0	6.15
Total		60	193	3.22	66	359	.354	116	23	30	0.38	276	.891	12	0.20	14	.857	234.0	6.62

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 6)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	7	1.75	13	2.11	27	3	.889	17.5	7.46
3	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	13	4.33	14	2.25	24	3	.875	19.0	9.55
5	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	14	1.94	34	6	.824	12.5	3.91
6	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	12	3.00	11	2.07	27	0	1.000	16.0	7.58
9	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	6	1.50	18	1.90	41	9	.780	14.5	5.88
12	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	8	2.00	17	2.28	29	3	.897	16.5	7.48
15	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	11	2.44	16	1	.938	12.5	7.05
16	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	13	1.97	32	2	.938	11.0	4.15
19	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	7	2.29	14	0	1.000	14.5	7.35
23	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	5	5	1	1.67	.	.	8	2.00	20	1	.950	16.5	7.16
33	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	16	2.11	35	2	.943	18.0	6.52
34	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	8	2.00	10	2.10	20	1	.950	12.5	6.24
38	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	18	1.98	41	6	.854	10.5	4.49
43	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	12	2.12	25	3	.880	18.0	7.51
44	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	4	1.33	6	2.08	13	0	1.000	14.5	7.50
46	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	2.08	24	1	.958	10.0	6.15
Total		60	1	34	35	3	0.58	91	1.52	198	2.08	422	41	.903	234.0	6.62