Players

George Wright 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	14	13	17	14	8

Season 9 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
376 4th	.558 33rd	23 84th	90 77th	56 93rd

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	3	17	.588	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	0	0.00	1	.000	13.5	8.94
3	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	22	5.50	9	42	.310	5	1	1	0.25	14	.929	1	0.25	1	1.000	24.0	8.44
4	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	23	4.60	2	30	.700	8	3	2	0.60	18	.889	1	0.20	1	1.000	26.0	7.58
6	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	2	24	.542	6	2	3	0.50	14	.786	0	0.00	1	.000	17.5	5.49
7	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	12	.417	9	1	0	0.33	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.20
9	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	0	17	.706	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	1	0.33	1	1.000	12.5	7.99
10	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	17	5.67	3	21	.667	4	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	19.0	8.72
12	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	28	5.60	3	38	.658	1	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	29.5	6.63
14	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	9	32	.250	6	0	1	0.00	16	.938	1	0.20	1	1.000	17.0	5.73
15	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	13	.538	4	2	1	0.67	10	.900	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.02
17	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	20	6.67	3	27	.630	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	20.5	8.45
18	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	15	.333	4	2	3	0.67	9	.667	0	0.00	1	.000	13.5	6.15
21	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	13	.692	9	1	2	0.33	15	.867	1	0.33	1	1.000	11.5	6.96
22	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	19	6.33	1	23	.783	8	3	0	1.00	14	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	23.0	9.29
25	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	5	21	.333	4	1	1	0.25	12	.917	.	.	.	.	15.0	5.52
26	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	22	4.40	2	29	.690	7	1	1	0.20	19	.947	.	.	.	.	24.0	7.74
30	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	21	.381	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	0	0.00	1	.000	11.5	7.26
32	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	27	5.40	3	37	.649	7	1	2	0.20	17	.882	.	.	.	.	31.0	8.26
34	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	15	.600	1	1	1	0.25	9	.889	0	0.00	1	.000	13.5	6.11
35	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	0	13	.769	3	0	3	0.00	11	.727	1	0.33	1	1.000	10.0	6.22
39	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	14	.643	14	2	2	0.67	18	.889	1	0.33	2	.500	13.5	8.69
40	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	19	3.80	3	27	.593	5	0	3	0.00	14	.786	0	0.00	1	.000	22.0	7.44
44	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	18	3.60	3	35	.429	1	1	2	0.20	10	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	20.5	6.63
45	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	2	18	.778	3	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	19.0	8.89
Total		90	376	4.18	67	554	.558	118	23	36	0.26	300	.880	8	0.09	17	.471	427.5	7.26

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	9	3.00	13	2.55	20	1	.950	13.5	8.94
3	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	17	2.20	35	2	.943	24.0	8.44
4	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	20	2.25	36	3	.917	26.0	7.58
6	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	13	1.71	34	10	.706	17.5	5.49
7	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	10	2.24	17	2	.882	8.5	5.20
9	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	13	2.58	19	0	1.000	12.5	7.99
10	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	9	2.39	18	0	1.000	19.0	8.72
12	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	18	1.83	54	6	.889	29.5	6.63
14	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	18	2.06	33	6	.818	17.0	5.73
15	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	5	2.00	16	1	.938	11.5	6.02
17	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	9	2.29	17	1	.941	20.5	8.45
18	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	5	1.79	14	3	.786	13.5	6.15
21	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	9	2.12	17	1	.941	11.5	6.96
22	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	10	2.29	17	1	.941	23.0	9.29
25	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	5	1.25	11	1.76	38	5	.868	15.0	5.52
26	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	23	2.28	43	2	.953	24.0	7.74
30	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	14	2.68	19	0	1.000	11.5	7.26
32	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	5	1.00	25	2.06	48	7	.854	31.0	8.26
34	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	7	1.75	18	2.21	34	3	.912	13.5	6.11
35	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	16	2.20	30	3	.900	10.0	6.22
39	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	9	2.50	14	0	1.000	13.5	8.69
40	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	2	0.40	21	2.20	35	4	.886	22.0	7.44
44	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	21	2.18	40	2	.950	20.5	6.63
45	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	3	1.00	15	2.24	25	4	.840	19.0	8.89
Total		90	1	55	56	4	0.62	90	1.00	342	2.15	673	67	.900	427.5	7.26