Players

Gerald Rogers 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	13	14	8	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	14	.500	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.31
3	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	11	.182	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.37
4	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	13	.385	4	1	3	0.33	10	.700	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.73
5	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	1	12	.667	5	2	2	0.50	15	.867	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.42
7	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	4	19	.316	7	1	3	0.20	18	.833	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.81
8	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	10	.700	4	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.73
10	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	9	.667	5	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.25
11	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	6	13	-.154	8	0	2	0.00	17	.882	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.78
13	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	11	.455	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.49
14	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	12	.583	8	1	1	0.33	14	.929	.	.	.	.	12.5	10.00
17	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	5	15	.200	6	2	2	0.40	16	.875	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.92
18	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	4	19	.421	8	2	4	0.50	16	.750	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.95
21	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	9	.222	11	1	0	0.33	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.77
22	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	10	.500	2	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.93
25	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	8	1.000	2	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.28
26	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	6	.667	5	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.25
29	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	7	.429	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.23
30	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	4	15	.200	3	2	2	0.50	11	.818	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.62
39	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	10	.300	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.45
40	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	1	13	.462	4	3	1	0.60	13	.923	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.90
Total		71	144	2.03	48	236	.407	92	20	31	0.28	235	.868	.	.	.	.	194.5	6.31

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.31
3	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.37
4	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.73
5	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.42
7	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.81
8	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	2	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.73
10	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.25
11	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.78
13	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.49
14	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	10.00
17	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.92
18	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	1	4	5	1	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.95
21	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.77
22	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.93
25	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.28
26	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.25
29	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.23
30	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.62
39	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.45
40	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.90
Total		71	4	53	57	8	0.80	13	0.18	.	.	.	.	.	194.5	6.31