Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	3	.000	4	0	3	0.00	17	.824	46	9.20	103	.447	2.0	4.00
8	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	25	8.33	73	.342	3.0	3.95
10	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	3	1	2	0.33	10	.800	27	9.00	67	.403	3.5	4.20
13	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	2	0	1	0.00	12	.917	38	9.50	85	.447	0.0	3.54
19	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	5	0	4	0.00	13	.692	26	8.67	69	.377	1.0	4.67
29	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	4	.250	6	1	4	0.20	19	.789	63	12.60	120	.525	5.0	8.37
35	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	5	0	2	0.00	13	.846	29	9.67	63	.460	1.0	5.16
Total		26	8	0.31	4	25	.160	25	2	17	0.08	91	.813	254	9.77	580	.438	15.5	4.84

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.00
8	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.95
10	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.20
13	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	3.54
19	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.67
29	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	8.37
35	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	5.16
Total		26	0	11	11	1	0.42	17	0.65	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	4.84