Players

Diego Campos 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	18	15	9	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	16	.313	1	1	3	0.33	7	.571	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.63
3	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	18	.278	5	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.38
5	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	1	10	.400	7	1	6	0.25	16	.625	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.22
6	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	8	.750	5	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.70
8	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	13	.231	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.28
9	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	6	.167	12	2	2	0.67	19	.895	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.65
10	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	12	.417	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.77
12	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	12	.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.32
14	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	7	.714	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.98
15	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	13	.385	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.14
16	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	1	14	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.84
17	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	9	.778	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.68
19	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	4	13	.231	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.49
21	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	13	.615	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.37
22	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	2	9	.222	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.43
26	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	5	15	.133	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.83
29	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	7	20	.150	5	2	1	0.50	18	.944	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.84
32	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	11	.364	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.42
34	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	14	.571	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.46
35	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	6	18	.167	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.83
40	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	4	20	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.34
45	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	2	14	.571	5	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.56
Total		82	165	2.01	58	285	.375	44	7	21	0.09	117	.821	.	.	.	.	217.0	6.10

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	2	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.63
3	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.38
5	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.22
6	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.70
8	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.28
9	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.65
10	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.77
12	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.32
14	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.98
15	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.14
16	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.84
17	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.68
19	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	1	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.49
21	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.37
22	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.43
26	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	1	5	6	1	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.83
29	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.84
32	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.42
34	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.46
35	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	1	7	8	0	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.83
40	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	1	5	6	0	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.34
45	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.56
Total		82	8	74	82	7	1.00	7	0.09	.	.	.	.	.	217.0	6.10