Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 9 hours and 48 minutes
MSWL UNITEDMSWL U2TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 08:11:04 AM (gmt)
 
ball TMVL  Season 17 // Landing
Logo
 
Home Blog Coaches Login Rankings Rules Scores Standings Stats Support Teams Waitlist
 
DonateELO RankingHonor RollNET RankingStats LeadersTeams Of The WeekWall
 
PAC 8 Conference SEC Conference
BIG 8 Conference Big East Conference
ball
JOIN
TMVL!
Diego Campos
5
Middle Blocker (MB)
 
Player Skills
SERVINGRECEIVINGBLOCKINGATTACKINGDEFENSESETTING
14-18159-
Season 9 Totals
KILLSATK PCTACESDIGSBLOCKS
231
68th
.579
22nd
6
301st
4
445th
75
27th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

MatchSetsAttackServeSet
mopponent/setsspkk/setapctptssasesa/stapctaa/stapctptsrating
1Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)372.3319.667..........8.56.33
3San Jose W (3–0 sets)393.00213.538..........11.07.84
5Kentucky W (3–0 sets)372.33210.500..........9.57.77
6Pekin W (3–0 sets)372.33071.000..........7.03.45
8Nashville W (3–0 sets)362.0007.857..........9.58.14
9Mendon L (2–3 sets)5132.60317.588..........14.04.76
10Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)5163.20219.7378420.8021.905....22.07.05
12Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)3103.33213.6153030.009.667....10.56.48
13Starkville W (3–0 sets)3103.33213.615..........10.55.37
14Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)5163.20222.636..........17.55.77
17Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)351.6738.250..........7.06.00
18Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)362.00411.182..........9.07.78
22Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)5112.20114.714..........13.04.71
25Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)461.50211.364..........8.55.28
26Arlington L (1–3 sets)4123.00216.625..........13.05.68
29Antioch W (3–0 sets)3103.33012.833..........12.08.01
30Portland L (1–3 sets)4143.50217.706..........16.56.42
34Nashville W (3–0 sets)382.67010.800..........13.08.84
35Burlington L (1–3 sets)482.00114.500..........8.53.58
39Kentucky L (2–3 sets)5153.00524.4178220.4021.905....17.55.92
40Starkville W (3–2 sets)581.60515.2005040.0018.778....11.06.66
44Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)5142.80216.750..........15.04.94
45Dallas W (3–2 sets)5132.60420.450..........14.04.28
Total892312.6047318.579246110.0769.841....278.06.13

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

MatchSetsBlockDigReceive
mopponent/setsspsatbeblk/sdd/s3rtrcvepctptsrating
1Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)303311.00.......8.56.33
3San Jose W (3–0 sets)304401.33.......11.07.84
5Kentucky W (3–0 sets)305521.67.......9.57.77
6Pekin W (3–0 sets)3............7.03.45
8Nashville W (3–0 sets)307702.33.......9.58.14
9Mendon L (2–3 sets)502210.40.......14.04.76
10Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)512300.6010.20.....22.07.05
12Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)301100.3331.00.....10.56.48
13Starkville W (3–0 sets)301110.33.......10.55.37
14Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)503300.60.......17.55.77
17Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)304411.33.......7.06.00
18Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)306612.00.......9.07.78
22Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)512310.60.......13.04.71
25Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)413401.00.......8.55.28
26Arlington L (1–3 sets)402210.50.......13.05.68
29Antioch W (3–0 sets)304401.33.......12.08.01
30Portland L (1–3 sets)421300.75.......16.56.42
34Nashville W (3–0 sets)318913.00.......13.08.84
35Burlington L (1–3 sets)401100.25.......8.53.58
39Kentucky L (2–3 sets)501110.20.......17.55.92
40Starkville W (3–2 sets)506611.20.......11.06.66
44Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)502210.40.......15.04.94
45Dallas W (3–2 sets)510100.20.......14.04.28
Total8976875130.8440.04.....278.06.13