Players

Diego Campos 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	18	15	9	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	13	.615	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.12
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	10	.800	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.84
5	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	7	25	.280	3	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.15
6	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	3	15	.333	6	0	0	0.00	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.82
7	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	11	.455	3	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.80
9	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	15	.267	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	11.5	9.21
10	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	13	.462	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.72
12	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	14	.286	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.77
15	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	2	15	.533	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.54
16	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	15	.467	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.89
17	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	11	.545	6	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.03
20	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	9	.778	4	2	2	0.67	11	.818	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.46
22	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	9	.556	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.48
26	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	5	.800	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.65
30	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	1	17	.824	3	2	2	0.50	11	.818	.	.	.	.	21.0	9.87
33	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	9	.444	6	1	2	0.25	16	.875	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.21
34	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	2	17	.529	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.64
35	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	4	18	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.51
39	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	1	11	.818	10	6	3	1.20	22	.864	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.93
40	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	1	10	.600	6	1	2	0.25	18	.889	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.55
44	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	0	15	.800	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.68
45	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	1	18	.722	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.42
Total		84	199	2.37	42	295	.532	49	14	18	0.17	140	.871	.	.	.	.	264.0	6.92

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.12
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.84
5	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.15
6	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	1	5	6	0	1.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.82
7	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.80
9	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	1	5	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	9.21
10	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.72
12	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	1	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.77
15	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.54
16	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	1	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.89
17	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.03
20	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.46
22	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	2	4	6	1	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.48
26	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.65
30	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	1	6	7	0	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	21.0	9.87
33	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	8	8	2	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.21
34	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	1	5	6	1	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.64
35	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.51
39	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.93
40	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.55
44	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.68
45	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.42
Total		84	9	84	93	10	1.11	9	0.11	.	.	.	.	.	264.0	6.92