Players

Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 8 hours and 48 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 09:11:37 AM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Federico Lorenzo 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	14	16	9	-

Season 6 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
64 257th	.242 233rd	3 380th	13 402nd	34 245th

Career Honors

S81st All-BIG-EAST

S92nd All-TMVL1st All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 6)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	12	.083	5	1	5	0.33	12	.583	.	.	.	.	8.0	8.12
3	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	6	12	-.250	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.80
4	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	4	8	-.250	4	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.18
6	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	7	.286	3	0	4	0.00	10	.600	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.34
7	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	13	.615	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.40
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	7	11	-.545	6	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.54
12	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	3	7	-.143	4	1	2	0.25	13	.846	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.38
15	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	4	15	.400	8	0	3	0.00	18	.833	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.49
17	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	11	.364	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.66
29	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	10	.700	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.05
33	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	8	1.000	4	1	4	0.33	10	.600	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.94
39	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	2	18	.444	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.50
Total		40	64	1.60	32	132	.242	36	3	24	0.08	103	.767	.	.	.	.	85.5	5.45

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 6)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	8.12
3	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.80
4	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.18
6	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.34
7	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.40
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.54
12	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.38
15	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.49
17	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.66
29	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	1	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.05
33	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.94
39	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	1	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.50
Total		40	3	31	34	4	0.85	13	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	85.5	5.45