Players

Federico Lorenzo 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	14	16	9	-

Career Honors

S81st All-BIG-EAST

S92nd All-TMVL1st All-BIG-EAST

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	1	11	.727	6	2	5	0.50	16	.688	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.69
3	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	7	.714	3	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.13
7	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	4	16	.500	9	2	2	0.67	17	.882	.	.	.	.	16.0	10.00
8	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	7	.857	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.74
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	15	.333	1	1	0	0.33	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.59
12	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	3	14	.571	10	1	2	0.20	21	.905	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.59
15	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	2	16	.688	5	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	15.5	10.00
16	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	1	17	.765	9	4	2	1.00	19	.895	.	.	.	.	19.5	7.58
21	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	1	15	.667	8	0	3	0.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.37
22	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	4	22	.591	7	3	2	0.75	16	.875	.	.	.	.	23.5	10.00
25	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	1	14	.643	10	2	0	0.50	19	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.17
26	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	1	13	.769	3	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.5	9.94
30	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	11	.545	4	1	3	0.33	10	.700	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.82
32	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	7	16	.125	5	1	1	0.25	15	.933	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.06
35	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	7	19	.263	4	1	1	0.25	13	.923	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.82
39	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	17	.294	9	2	0	0.67	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.0	9.06
40	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	3	21	.571	6	0	2	0.00	18	.889	.	.	.	.	18.5	9.20
44	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	1	17	.824	4	1	1	0.25	15	.933	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.66
45	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	2	18	.611	5	1	2	0.20	19	.895	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.14
Total		71	210	2.96	49	286	.563	110	23	30	0.32	275	.891	.	.	.	.	274.5	8.08

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.69
3	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.13
7	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	10.00
8	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	9	9	0	3.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.74
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.59
12	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.59
15	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	10.00
16	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	7.58
21	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.37
22	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	23.5	10.00
25	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.17
26	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	9.94
30	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.82
32	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.06
35	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	8	8	0	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.82
39	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	9.06
40	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	9.20
44	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.66
45	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	1	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.14
Total		71	4	75	79	7	1.11	29	0.41	.	.	.	.	.	274.5	8.08