Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	8	1	1	0.33	16	.938	46	15.33	67	.687	2.5	9.20
3	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	10	3	0	1.00	18	1.000	35	11.67	57	.614	5.0	7.82
5	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	1	8	.500	5	1	3	0.20	19	.842	57	11.40	93	.613	7.5	6.68
6	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	6	.167	4	3	2	0.75	17	.882	51	12.75	90	.567	6.5	8.40
8	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2	2	0.67	14	.857	33	11.00	58	.569	3.0	6.09
9	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	1	10	.400	7	3	3	0.60	20	.850	58	11.60	94	.617	8.0	6.68
11	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	2	.000	12	4	1	0.80	26	.962	53	10.60	101	.525	6.0	6.12
12	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.33	12	.833	43	14.33	66	.652	1.0	8.12
13	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	2	1.000	6	1	1	0.25	18	.944	52	13.00	79	.658	5.0	8.84
16	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	5	.600	1	0	1	0.00	10	.900	38	12.67	68	.559	7.0	8.36
17	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	5	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	33	11.00	57	.579	3.5	5.98
19	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	7	.143	8	3	1	0.60	21	.952	58	11.60	92	.630	6.5	7.76
22	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	3	.333	8	0	2	0.00	22	.909	64	12.80	100	.640	2.0	8.34
23	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	4	3	1	1.00	12	.917	27	9.00	59	.458	6.0	5.07
25	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	1	-1.000	11	1	2	0.33	19	.895	40	13.33	56	.714	1.5	8.91
30	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	4	.750	8	3	4	0.75	19	.789	50	12.50	78	.641	6.0	8.20
32	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	0	5	.800	6	3	1	0.60	19	.947	63	12.60	104	.606	7.5	7.64
35	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	5	.400	5	1	3	0.25	17	.824	47	11.75	76	.618	4.0	7.06
Total		70	38	0.54	7	75	.413	119	34	30	0.49	311	.904	848	12.11	1395	.608	88.5	7.52

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	9.20
3	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	7.82
5	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.68
6	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	8.40
8	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.09
9	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.68
11	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	2	0.40	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.12
12	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	8.12
13	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	8.84
16	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	2	2	4	1	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	8.36
17	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.98
19	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.76
22	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.34
23	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.07
25	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	8.91
30	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	8.20
32	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.64
35	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.06
Total		70	3	27	30	7	0.43	64	0.91	.	.	.	.	.	88.5	7.52