Players

Pablo Mendez 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	16	14	14	11	7

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	4	24	.250	2	1	3	0.33	8	.625	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.87
6	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	3	27	.481	7	1	3	0.25	18	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	18.0	8.90
8	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	6	22	.273	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.71
9	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	6	26	.077	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	1	0.25	1	1.000	9.0	4.52
10	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	5	14	-.071	2	0	3	0.00	11	.727	0	0.00	1	.000	5.5	4.18
11	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	19	.158	6	0	2	0.00	16	.875	1	0.25	3	.333	8.5	5.56
13	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	18	.278	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	12.0	6.61
15	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	14	.429	6	3	2	0.75	14	.857	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.45
17	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	3	22	.455	3	0	3	0.00	12	.750	1	0.25	1	1.000	14.5	7.35
18	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	6	32	.406	1	0	4	0.00	7	.429	.	.	.	.	23.5	8.40
22	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	19	.474	2	0	4	0.00	11	.636	1	0.33	1	1.000	12.5	7.75
25	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	23	4.60	7	38	.421	6	0	5	0.00	18	.722	0	0.00	3	.000	23.5	7.81
26	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	21	.429	1	1	2	0.33	8	.750	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	7.37
33	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	20	.200	1	1	3	0.33	10	.700	1	0.33	1	1.000	9.0	3.95
34	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	28	.393	6	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.97
36	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	20	4.00	6	40	.350	1	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	21.0	7.51
46	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	25	5.00	8	42	.405	14	3	0	0.60	23	1.000	.	.	.	.	29.0	9.48
Total		66	218	3.30	75	426	.336	64	10	40	0.15	209	.809	5	0.08	14	.357	254.0	6.79

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	2.21	14	0	1.000	11.0	5.87
6	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	13	2.67	18	0	1.000	18.0	8.90
8	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	17	2.48	27	0	1.000	13.0	6.71
9	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	11	2.29	17	1	.941	9.0	4.52
10	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	8	2.44	16	0	1.000	5.5	4.18
11	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	10	2.50	13	2.45	20	1	.950	8.5	5.56
13	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	9	2.25	16	2	.875	12.0	6.61
15	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	2	0.50	13	2.45	20	0	1.000	14.5	5.45
17	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	17	2.54	26	0	1.000	14.5	7.35
18	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	9	9	1	2.25	8	2.00	8	2.13	16	2	.875	23.5	8.40
22	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	12	2.33	21	0	1.000	12.5	7.75
25	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	18	2.24	29	1	.966	23.5	7.81
26	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	8	2.53	15	0	1.000	13.0	7.37
33	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	1.86	14	2	.857	9.0	3.95
34	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	2	0.50	13	2.47	19	1	.947	16.5	7.97
36	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	17	2.46	26	2	.923	21.0	7.51
46	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	12	2.40	15	2.44	25	0	1.000	29.0	9.48
Total		66	2	48	50	2	0.76	77	1.17	203	2.38	339	12	.965	254.0	6.79