Players

Pablo Mendez 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	16	14	14	11	7

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	5	18	.222	15	3	0	1.00	20	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	12.5	6.99
3	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	23	.000	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.75
4	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	4	25	.400	7	1	0	0.33	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.59
5	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	8	30	.033	5	1	1	0.25	13	.923	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.61
7	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	6	26	.269	10	2	3	0.40	19	.842	0	0.00	1	.000	17.0	6.48
8	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	13	.154	2	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.86
10	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	7	22	.091	4	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.07
11	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	2	32	.438	6	1	3	0.20	16	.813	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.11
13	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	5	27	.296	3	2	2	0.67	12	.833	1	0.33	1	1.000	17.0	8.09
14	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	12	.167	3	1	3	0.33	9	.667	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.29
17	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	3	19	.211	8	2	3	0.40	18	.833	1	0.20	1	1.000	9.5	3.54
18	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	27	.333	5	1	4	0.25	14	.714	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.32
21	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	1	16	.625	3	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.67
22	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	6	27	.296	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.80
25	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	15	.533	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	0	0.00	1	.000	12.0	7.09
26	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	2	20	.600	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	0	0.00	1	.000	14.0	6.47
29	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	4	20	.350	6	2	2	0.67	11	.818	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.98
30	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	13	.077	4	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.57
Total		63	183	2.90	74	385	.283	91	18	31	0.29	214	.855	2	0.03	6	.333	222.5	6.02

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	7	2.14	14	2	.857	12.5	6.99
3	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	4	1.33	6	2.08	12	1	.917	5.5	3.75
4	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	8	2.14	14	2	.857	16.0	8.59
5	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	10	2.38	16	0	1.000	11.5	5.61
7	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	18	2.41	32	1	.969	17.0	6.48
8	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	6	2.00	6	2.15	13	0	1.000	9.0	4.86
10	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	9	1.79	24	5	.792	11.0	5.07
11	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	17	2.28	29	2	.931	19.0	7.11
13	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	1	0.33	11	2.24	21	0	1.000	17.0	8.09
14	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	3	1.78	9	2	.778	6.5	3.29
17	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	12	2.12	26	2	.923	9.5	3.54
18	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	8	2.00	16	2.13	30	3	.900	16.0	7.32
21	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	3	2.33	6	0	1.000	11.5	7.67
22	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	7	1.89	19	1	.947	16.0	6.80
25	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	5	2.08	12	1	.917	12.0	7.09
26	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	10	2.05	20	3	.850	14.0	6.47
29	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	1.85	20	2	.900	13.0	5.98
30	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	19	2.24	34	3	.912	5.5	3.57
Total		63	1	41	42	3	0.67	74	1.17	174	2.13	351	30	.915	222.5	6.02