Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	0	0	0	0.00	4	1.000	13	4.33	58	.224	0.0	1.76
6	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	5	.600	12	1	5	0.25	24	.792	46	11.50	93	.495	4.0	7.11
12	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	7	.286	4	1	2	0.25	15	.867	29	7.25	84	.345	3.0	2.86
18	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	2	6	-.167	4	1	4	0.20	17	.765	39	7.80	92	.424	3.0	3.80
21	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	5	.000	5	2	2	0.40	19	.895	51	10.20	97	.526	5.5	5.83
25	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	7	1	3	0.25	17	.824	39	9.75	96	.406	1.0	4.47
26	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	5	.000	5	2	3	0.50	16	.813	37	9.25	82	.451	4.0	4.58
40	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	7	-.143	3	0	3	0.00	11	.727	27	9.00	65	.415	1.0	3.58
45	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	8	.125	6	1	2	0.25	19	.895	36	9.00	88	.409	3.0	4.10
Total		36	11	0.31	9	50	.040	46	9	24	0.25	142	.831	317	8.81	755	.420	24.5	4.23

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.76
6	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.11
12	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.86
18	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.80
21	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.83
25	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.47
26	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.58
40	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.58
45	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.10
Total		36	1	7	8	0	0.22	33	0.92	.	.	.	.	.	24.5	4.23