Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	8	0	1	0.00	16	.938	28	9.33	58	.483	3.5	6.73
3	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	4	.250	3	0	3	0.00	16	.813	51	10.20	114	.447	1.5	5.18
8	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	5	.200	4	1	3	0.25	15	.800	40	10.00	94	.426	2.0	4.30
15	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	6	-.167	5	1	1	0.25	15	.933	39	9.75	90	.433	1.5	4.60
Total		16	2	0.13	2	19	.000	20	2	8	0.13	62	.871	158	9.88	356	.444	8.5	5.20

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.73
3	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	9	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	5.18
8	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.30
15	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.60
Total		16	0	9	9	0	0.56	23	1.44	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.20