Players

Colter Holland 6 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	15	15	14	14	4

Career Honors

S1MVP BIG-81st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	3	23	.565	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.67
6	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	3	26	.423	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.14
7	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	4	22	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	8.92
10	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	14	.571	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.92
11	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	7	30	.200	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.32
12	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	19	.368	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.25
14	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	3	33	.485	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	21.5	9.12
16	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	2	25	.520	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.58
18	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	21	4.20	7	38	.368	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	22.0	8.61
20	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	4	33	.364	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	21.0	8.45
21	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	24	.375	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.26
24	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	20	6.67	1	30	.633	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	23.0	8.72
25	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	16	.438	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.30
28	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	25	5.00	7	49	.367	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	25.5	8.83
29	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	4	23	.304	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.76
30	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	3	27	.444	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	8.17
31	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	18	6.00	1	24	.708	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	9.07
32	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	9	38	.211	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	22.0	8.18
33	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	19	.421	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.03
34	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	20	.450	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.80
35	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	3	21	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.89
36	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	11	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.81
Total		85	309	3.64	77	565	.411	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	367.5	7.35

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	1	0.33	6	2.00	NA	NA	11	1	.909	17.0	7.67
6	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	15	3.00	NA	NA	17	1	.941	15.5	6.14
7	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	6	2.00	NA	NA	17	1	.941	19.0	8.92
10	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	8	2.67	NA	NA	17	1	.941	10.5	6.92
11	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	7	1.40	NA	NA	34	3	.912	17.0	6.32
12	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	4	1.00	NA	NA	14	0	1.000	13.0	6.25
14	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	NA	NA	19	0	1.000	21.5	9.12
16	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	NA	NA	14	0	1.000	17.0	7.58
18	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	NA	NA	30	1	.967	22.0	8.61
20	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	NA	NA	19	1	.947	21.0	8.45
21	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	4	1.00	NA	NA	24	1	.958	17.5	7.26
24	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	5	1.67	NA	NA	15	1	.933	23.0	8.72
25	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	6	2.00	NA	NA	12	0	1.000	11.0	7.30
28	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	9	1.80	NA	NA	25	1	.960	25.5	8.83
29	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	5	1.67	NA	NA	18	0	1.000	13.0	7.76
30	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	NA	NA	12	0	1.000	18.5	8.17
31	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	NA	NA	13	0	1.000	19.5	9.07
32	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	NA	NA	16	1	.938	22.0	8.18
33	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	2	1.50	6	1.50	NA	NA	14	0	1.000	15.0	7.03
34	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	8	2.00	NA	NA	9	0	1.000	12.0	5.80
35	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	1	0.60	7	1.40	NA	NA	22	1	.955	13.0	4.89
36	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	NA	NA	13	1	.923	4.0	2.81
Total		85	2	63	65	10	0.76	137	1.61	0	0.00	385	15	.961	367.5	7.35