Players

Luke Wagner 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	14	15	16	14	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	4	20	.400	5	0	3	0.00	16	.813	0	0.00	1	.000	13.5	6.25
3	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	12	.167	2	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.26
6	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	29	5.80	7	43	.512	6	2	4	0.40	19	.789	.	.	.	.	32.5	8.69
8	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	13	.308	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.58
9	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	16	.125	3	3	2	1.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.76
10	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	16	.375	4	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.14
11	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	2	17	.588	11	3	1	0.75	20	.950	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.63
13	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	9	.222	5	2	1	0.67	10	.900	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.79
14	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	5	22	.364	7	0	3	0.00	14	.786	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.70
17	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	7	26	.192	8	3	4	0.75	18	.778	0	0.00	1	.000	17.0	6.77
19	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	15	.067	7	3	1	1.00	12	.917	0	0.00	1	.000	7.5	4.02
21	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	4	22	.364	5	2	0	0.67	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.14
22	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	14	.500	10	2	4	0.67	16	.750	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.61
25	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	16	.125	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.57
26	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	7	19	-.053	3	0	5	0.00	10	.500	.	.	.	.	6.0	2.54
27	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	14	.500	5	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.26
29	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	2	20	.500	5	0	1	0.00	16	.938	1	0.20	1	1.000	13.5	4.39
32	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	3	30	.367	11	3	4	0.60	23	.826	.	.	.	.	19.0	5.66
Total		63	175	2.78	61	344	.331	101	25	41	0.40	245	.833	1	0.02	4	.250	222.5	5.43

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	1	0.50	7	1.75	9	2.00	26	1	.962	13.5	6.25
3	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	10	2.04	25	1	.960	6.5	3.26
6	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	7	1.40	16	2.24	37	1	.973	32.5	8.69
8	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	15	2.15	27	4	.852	6.5	3.58
9	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	7	2.20	15	1	.933	10.5	4.76
10	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	4	2.09	11	1	.909	10.0	6.14
11	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	4	1.00	9	1.96	24	3	.875	18.0	6.63
13	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	8	2.29	14	1	.929	6.0	4.79
14	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	7	1.81	27	3	.889	13.5	6.70
17	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	13	2.07	28	2	.929	17.0	6.77
19	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	3	2.00	10	1	.900	7.5	4.02
21	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	8	2.21	14	1	.929	15.0	8.14
22	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	7	1.80	20	2	.900	9.5	4.61
25	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	12	2.00	26	4	.846	5.0	2.57
26	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	1.64	25	3	.880	6.0	2.54
27	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	3	1.00	10	2.82	11	0	1.000	13.0	8.26
29	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	1	0.20	19	2.05	41	6	.854	13.5	4.39
32	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	7	1.40	12	1.89	35	3	.914	19.0	5.66
Total		63	2	41	43	3	0.68	63	1.00	176	2.04	416	38	.909	222.5	5.43