Players

Luke Wagner 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	14	15	16	14	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	2	15	.400	9	2	3	0.40	18	.833	1	0.20	1	1.000	10.5	3.98
6	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	18	4.50	5	30	.433	6	3	3	0.75	16	.813	.	.	.	.	22.5	7.57
7	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	0	24	.708	6	2	1	0.40	17	.941	0	0.00	1	.000	22.0	7.38
9	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	21	7.00	5	26	.615	0	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	22.0	8.26
10	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	26	5.20	4	38	.579	6	0	1	0.00	17	.941	1	0.20	1	1.000	27.0	7.62
12	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	7	.286	2	1	3	0.33	9	.667	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.10
13	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	6	21	.286	10	1	1	0.33	16	.938	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.27
15	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	6	25	.320	5	1	0	0.25	12	1.000	1	0.25	1	1.000	19.0	8.50
17	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	23	5.75	4	34	.559	7	1	1	0.25	18	.944	.	.	.	.	25.0	8.51
18	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	3	25	.560	8	3	3	0.75	18	.833	.	.	.	.	21.0	8.79
21	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	20	6.67	1	26	.731	3	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	20.5	7.20
23	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	2	21	.667	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	20.0	6.12
25	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	5	25	.440	6	1	1	0.25	17	.941	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.38
31	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	5	25	.480	5	0	1	0.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.75
36	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	14	.500	17	2	1	0.67	23	.957	0	0.00	1	.000	11.5	7.37
Total		59	238	4.03	52	356	.522	94	17	22	0.29	229	.904	3	0.05	5	.600	277.0	7.12

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	4	0.80	22	2.25	36	5	.861	10.5	3.98
6	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	10	2.05	21	0	1.000	22.5	7.57
7	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	3	0.60	26	2.32	41	4	.902	22.0	7.38
9	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	21	2.52	33	0	1.000	22.0	8.26
10	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0	1	2	0.20	3	0.60	18	2.14	36	5	.861	27.0	7.62
12	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	14	2.17	23	4	.826	5.5	3.10
13	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	6	1.79	19	3	.842	14.5	7.27
15	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	1	6	7	1	1.75	6	1.50	22	2.51	35	0	1.000	19.0	8.50
17	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	17	2.20	35	1	.971	25.0	8.51
18	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	19	2.43	30	1	.967	21.0	8.79
21	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	10	1.88	24	3	.875	20.5	7.20
23	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	8	8	0	1.60	4	0.80	16	1.95	38	4	.895	20.0	6.12
25	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	16	2.09	32	1	.969	18.0	7.38
31	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	17	2.32	34	1	.971	18.0	7.75
36	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	7	2.27	15	1	.933	11.5	7.37
Total		59	2	40	42	5	0.71	54	0.92	241	2.21	452	33	.927	277.0	7.12