Players

Session 13 orders deadline in 30 hours and 51 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Saturday, May 2nd, 2026 - 11:08:41 AM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Jean Clement 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	-	17	16	9	-

Season 6 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
109 196th	.315 160th	2 403rd	9 425th	49 164th

Career Honors

S83rd All-TMVL2nd All-BIG-8

S91st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 6)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	14	.071	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.62
6	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	6	22	.136	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.93
11	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	2	23	.435	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.06
12	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	0	6	.833	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.58
13	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	14	.357	2	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	11.5	9.21
15	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	3	12	.333	11	0	4	0.00	24	.833	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.06
17	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	4	16	.438	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.89
18	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	5	19	.316	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.16
21	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	5	12	-.083	7	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.75
22	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	15	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.15
29	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	13	.462	2	1	2	0.25	11	.818	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.43
31	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	3	13	.385	0	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.36
34	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	1	7	.571	2	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.63
39	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	14	.143	4	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.55
Total		60	109	1.82	46	200	.315	28	2	18	0.03	86	.791	.	.	.	.	138.0	5.38

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 6)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.62
6	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.93
11	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.06
12	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.58
13	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	1	5	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	9.21
15	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.06
17	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.89
18	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	1	4	5	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.16
21	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.75
22	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.15
29	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.43
31	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.36
34	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.63
39	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.55
Total		60	5	44	49	3	0.82	9	0.15	.	.	.	.	.	138.0	5.38