Players

Jean Clement 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	-	17	16	9	-

Season 9 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
249 51st	.560 30th	45 2nd	24 326th	76 25th

Career Honors

S83rd All-TMVL2nd All-BIG-8

S91st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	1	15	.800	13	4	2	1.33	19	.895	.	.	.	.	18.5	9.34
5	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	15	.600	8	3	1	1.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	16.0	9.86
7	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	10	.600	5	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.09
8	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	2	15	.667	15	5	3	1.25	24	.875	.	.	.	.	20.5	10.00
10	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	2	16	.625	7	2	0	0.50	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.60
12	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	18	3.60	7	26	.423	4	2	1	0.40	18	.944	.	.	.	.	22.5	8.22
14	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	5	21	.429	13	6	3	1.20	24	.875	.	.	.	.	22.0	7.88
16	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	11	.727	4	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.17
19	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	4	18	.333	4	0	4	0.00	15	.733	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.97
20	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	2	15	.533	11	4	5	1.00	22	.773	.	.	.	.	16.5	8.17
23	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	13	.692	4	2	2	0.50	16	.875	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.76
24	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	3	16	.625	7	2	2	0.50	19	.895	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.21
25	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	2	18	.667	9	1	0	0.33	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.17
26	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	3	17	.412	3	2	4	0.40	17	.765	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.22
29	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	5	10	.000	10	2	4	0.50	21	.810	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.27
32	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	14	.571	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.27
34	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	13	.692	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.49
37	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	3	17	.529	5	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.85
39	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	1	12	.750	8	3	3	0.75	18	.833	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.61
42	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	8	1.000	4	3	3	1.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.73
44	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	5	15	.200	5	1	2	0.25	14	.857	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.75
46	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	1	13	.846	4	1	1	0.20	12	.917	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.33
47	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	13	.538	8	1	1	0.25	16	.938	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.68
Total		88	249	2.83	58	341	.560	153	45	44	0.51	363	.879	.	.	.	.	334.5	7.55

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	9.34
5	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	9.86
7	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.09
8	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	1	5	6	1	1.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	20.5	10.00
10	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.60
12	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	22.5	8.22
14	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	22.0	7.88
16	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.17
19	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	1	6	7	1	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.97
20	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	8.17
23	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.76
24	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	2	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.21
25	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.17
26	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	2	0.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.22
29	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.27
32	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.27
34	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.49
37	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.85
39	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.61
42	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.73
44	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.75
46	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.33
47	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.68
Total		88	5	71	76	14	0.86	24	0.27	.	.	.	.	.	334.5	7.55