Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	3	-.667	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	27	9.00	68	.397	0.0	2.68
5	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	5	-.200	2	0	3	0.00	8	.625	28	9.33	64	.438	2.0	5.60
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	6	0	3	0.00	12	.750	25	8.33	66	.379	2.0	4.76
12	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	7	.286	4	0	3	0.00	13	.769	30	7.50	79	.380	2.5	3.78
15	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	2	.000	1	0	2	0.00	10	.800	37	9.25	89	.416	4.0	5.19
17	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	3	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	31	10.33	61	.508	2.0	6.09
33	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	27	9.00	59	.458	2.5	4.14
39	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	1	10	.200	5	0	1	0.00	14	.929	46	9.20	89	.517	3.5	4.34
44	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	5	-.200	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	46	15.33	61	.754	1.5	8.82
Total		31	9	0.29	6	41	.073	26	0	17	0.00	89	.809	297	9.58	636	.467	20.0	5.04

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	2.68
5	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.60
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.76
12	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.78
15	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.19
17	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.09
33	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.14
39	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.34
44	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	8.82
Total		31	1	20	21	2	0.68	31	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	20.0	5.04