Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	4	.000	6	1	1	0.25	14	.929	44	11.00	78	.564	3.5	5.96
3	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	5	.600	5	0	4	0.00	12	.667	37	12.33	71	.521	4.0	9.09
8	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	4	1.000	2	1	2	0.33	8	.750	34	11.33	52	.654	7.5	7.31
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	4	.750	4	0	2	0.00	10	.800	28	9.33	56	.500	4.0	6.21
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	4	2	2	0.67	10	.800	34	11.33	65	.523	4.5	6.70
12	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	0	6	.667	5	0	3	0.00	15	.800	61	12.20	93	.656	4.0	7.34
15	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	6	.667	8	0	1	0.00	12	.917	31	10.33	45	.689	5.5	8.00
16	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	5	.000	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	51	12.75	88	.580	1.0	6.82
18	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	5	.400	6	2	3	0.40	18	.833	62	12.40	96	.646	4.5	7.60
26	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	5	0	3	0.00	10	.700	41	13.67	63	.651	0.5	8.62
30	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	11	2	1	0.67	15	.933	38	12.67	60	.633	3.0	8.82
32	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	3	.333	2	0	3	0.00	11	.727	49	12.25	76	.645	1.5	6.54
35	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	4	.250	1	0	4	0.00	10	.600	48	12.00	80	.600	2.0	6.74
39	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	4	.750	8	1	1	0.33	12	.917	40	13.33	68	.588	5.5	10.00
40	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	3	.333	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	67	13.40	101	.663	3.0	7.64
44	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	4	.750	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	60	15.00	85	.706	3.0	8.44
45	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	2	.000	10	3	1	0.60	21	.952	67	13.40	99	.677	4.5	8.68
Total		64	34	0.53	3	66	.470	85	12	36	0.19	212	.830	792	12.38	1276	.621	61.5	7.68

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.96
3	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.09
8	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	1	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.31
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.21
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.70
12	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.34
15	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	12	4.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	8.00
16	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	6.82
18	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.60
26	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	8.62
30	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.82
32	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	6.54
35	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.74
39	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	10.00
40	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	7.64
44	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.44
45	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	8.68
Total		64	0	31	31	7	0.48	76	1.19	.	.	.	.	.	61.5	7.68