Players

Matthieu Chapelle 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	15	15	14	15

Season 8 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
807 23rd	49 281st	22 86th	90 89th	45 172nd

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
6	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	3	.333	6	0	2	0.00	14	.857	32	8.00	87	.368	2.5	4.64
9	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	29	9.67	71	.408	3.5	5.66
12	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	1	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	19	6.33	67	.284	1.0	1.40
13	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	6	.500	9	0	2	0.00	16	.875	39	13.00	53	.736	5.0	10.00
15	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	2	9	.333	6	1	3	0.20	18	.833	55	11.00	97	.567	10.0	7.05
17	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	7	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	29	9.67	44	.659	4.0	6.79
19	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	1	5	.600	5	1	2	0.20	18	.889	48	9.60	79	.608	7.5	5.76
21	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	3	.333	7	1	0	0.20	20	1.000	60	12.00	109	.550	3.5	7.78
22	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	8	0	2	0.00	14	.857	34	11.33	55	.618	3.0	7.73
25	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	5	.600	7	0	1	0.00	13	.923	32	10.67	49	.653	3.5	6.92
26	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	0	8	.625	7	4	3	1.00	17	.824	46	11.50	78	.590	9.0	6.79
29	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	7	.143	4	1	2	0.20	13	.846	57	11.40	94	.606	4.5	6.92
30	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	27	9.00	54	.500	2.5	4.46
34	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	5	.400	7	3	3	0.75	17	.824	48	12.00	71	.676	7.5	8.15
38	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	2	1.000	9	2	4	0.40	22	.818	64	12.80	118	.542	5.5	8.45
39	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	5	.800	8	1	0	0.33	15	1.000	40	13.33	61	.656	5.5	9.22
40	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	4	.250	7	1	2	0.20	18	.889	51	10.20	100	.510	3.5	5.86
44	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	6	.333	11	4	3	1.33	17	.824	35	11.67	48	.729	7.0	7.89
45	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	7	.429	6	2	1	0.40	20	.950	62	12.40	98	.633	5.5	7.64
Total		74	49	0.66	7	89	.472	120	22	31	0.30	288	.892	807	10.91	1433	.563	94.0	6.80

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
6	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.64
9	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.66
12	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.40
13	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	10.00
15	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	8	8	1	1.60	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.05
17	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.79
19	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.76
21	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	11	2.20	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.78
22	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	7.73
25	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.92
26	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.79
29	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.92
30	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.46
34	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	8.15
38	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	8.45
39	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	9.22
40	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.86
44	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.89
45	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	7.64
Total		74	1	44	45	5	0.61	90	1.22	.	.	.	.	.	94.0	6.80