Players

Dirk Brandstetter 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	13	13	15	12	5

Season 9 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
242 58th	.469 89th	14 171st	90 77th	53 113th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	11	.545	15	2	2	0.67	19	.895	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.22
6	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	6	25	.280	1	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.02
7	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	11	.818	7	2	0	0.67	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.93
9	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	18	6.00	1	22	.773	4	1	1	0.33	12	.917	1	0.33	1	1.000	21.0	9.05
11	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	4	25	.480	5	0	2	0.00	17	.882	0	0.00	1	.000	16.5	7.66
12	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	2	25	.600	4	0	2	0.00	16	.875	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.23
14	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	3	22	.591	3	0	1	0.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.21
16	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	11	.364	3	3	2	1.00	10	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	11.0	5.38
19	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	2	18	.667	11	1	1	0.25	20	.950	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.44
20	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	21	.429	2	1	2	0.25	12	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	15.5	5.59
23	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	3	14	.071	2	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	4.5	2.70
24	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	12	.250	3	0	4	0.00	14	.714	1	0.25	1	1.000	7.0	2.70
25	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	11	.455	6	0	2	0.00	12	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	9.5	5.46
26	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	4	26	.462	8	1	1	0.20	19	.947	2	0.40	2	1.000	18.0	6.51
29	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	5	18	.278	7	0	0	0.00	18	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	12.0	6.68
32	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	11	.727	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.13
34	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	2	19	.579	8	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.49
37	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	3	6	.000	8	1	1	0.25	17	.941	0	0.00	1	.000	4.5	4.15
39	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	7	21	.143	4	0	3	0.00	14	.786	0	0.00	2	.000	10.5	3.79
42	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	12	.500	3	1	2	0.33	11	.818	1	0.33	1	1.000	10.0	4.83
44	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	0	14	.571	3	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.94
46	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	0	15	.467	5	0	2	0.00	15	.867	0	0.00	1	.000	7.5	2.44
47	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	18	.500	5	1	1	0.25	15	.933	1	0.25	1	1.000	14.5	7.02
Total		88	242	2.75	60	388	.469	119	14	38	0.16	328	.884	6	0.07	15	.400	284.0	5.72

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	8	2.21	14	1	.929	10.0	6.22
6	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	9	2.25	11	2.20	20	1	.950	14.5	7.02
7	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	8	2.13	15	1	.933	12.0	6.93
9	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	12	2.33	21	0	1.000	21.0	9.05
11	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	14	2.46	24	0	1.000	16.5	7.66
12	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	4	0.80	24	2.18	44	5	.886	17.5	6.23
14	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	9	1.80	8	2.00	19	1	.947	17.5	6.21
16	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	15	2.38	24	1	.958	11.0	5.38
19	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	15	2.21	34	1	.971	16.0	7.44
20	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	17	1.88	40	6	.850	15.5	5.59
23	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	16	2.02	42	4	.905	4.5	2.70
24	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	2	0.50	1	0.25	16	1.93	40	6	.850	7.0	2.70
25	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	2	1	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	12	1.92	26	4	.846	9.5	5.46
26	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	19	2.16	38	3	.921	18.0	6.51
29	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	8	2.00	9	2.22	18	0	1.000	12.0	6.68
32	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	4	1.33	8	1.94	17	4	.765	11.5	6.13
34	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	8	1.88	32	3	.906	14.5	7.49
37	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	18	2.26	34	2	.941	4.5	4.15
39	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	14	1.79	38	6	.842	10.5	3.79
42	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	11	1.96	27	4	.852	10.0	4.83
44	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	4	1.00	22	2.20	41	3	.927	8.5	3.94
46	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	2	0.20	2	0.40	14	1.90	31	6	.806	7.5	2.44
47	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	7	1.75	18	2.30	30	3	.900	14.5	7.02
Total		88	3	50	53	6	0.60	90	1.02	317	2.09	669	65	.903	284.0	5.72