Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	0	0.00	4	1.000	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	5.15
9	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.33	7	.857	2	0.67	5	.400	1.0	4.55
12	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	1	0.33	10	.900	0	0.00	2	.000	1.0	5.08
15	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	3	5	0.60	21	.762	5	1.00	7	.714	3.0	8.16
17	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	4	0.33	12	.667	2	0.67	4	.500	1.0	3.43
21	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	3	1	1.00	15	.933	3	1.00	8	.375	3.0	8.78
25	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	3	1.00	9	.333	0.0	9.06
30	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	3	1.00	7	.429	0.0	5.10
35	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	8	.875	5	1.67	9	.556	0.0	8.01
40	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	15	.867	6	1.50	9	.667	0.0	10.00
Total		33	.	.	.	.	.	29	9	19	0.27	109	.826	30	0.91	63	.476	9.0	6.73

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	7	2.17	12	1	.917	0.0	5.15
9	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	2.23	13	1	.923	1.0	4.55
12	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	2.53	15	0	1.000	1.0	5.08
15	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.00	15	2.48	23	0	1.000	3.0	8.16
17	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	6	2.17	12	1	.917	1.0	3.43
21	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	11	2.50	18	0	1.000	3.0	8.78
25	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	12	2.86	14	0	1.000	0.0	9.06
30	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	2.31	13	1	.923	0.0	5.10
35	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	11	2.25	20	2	.900	0.0	8.01
40	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	14	3.50	18	2.65	23	1	.957	0.0	10.00
Total		33	.	.	.	.	.	76	2.30	103	2.44	163	7	.957	9.0	6.73