Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	0	5	1.000	12	0	1	0.00	20	.950	46	11.50	98	.469	5.5	7.91
4	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	4	.250	6	0	4	0.00	19	.789	53	10.60	108	.491	4.5	6.73
6	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	11	1	2	0.33	19	.895	32	10.67	78	.410	2.5	6.65
7	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	7	.429	17	2	3	0.40	28	.893	50	10.00	113	.442	5.5	6.12
9	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	8	.000	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	24	8.00	68	.353	3.0	4.39
10	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	26	8.67	61	.426	0.0	3.18
12	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	3	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	30	10.00	73	.411	0.5	4.48
14	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	3	0	3	0.00	10	.700	27	9.00	71	.380	2.0	5.32
18	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	6	.333	9	2	4	0.50	19	.789	34	8.50	97	.351	5.5	5.66
21	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	6	0	0	0.00	15	1.000	32	10.67	64	.500	1.0	6.09
25	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	4	-.500	0	0	2	0.00	8	.750	35	11.67	83	.422	0.5	5.34
31	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	0	0	3	0.00	5	.400	19	6.33	54	.352	1.0	2.73
36	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	1	0	2	0.00	6	.667	22	7.33	66	.333	1.0	2.71
39	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	7	0	3	0.00	15	.800	27	9.00	66	.409	2.0	5.30
44	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	19	6.33	54	.352	0.5	1.42
Total		51	17	0.33	9	55	.145	78	5	31	0.10	196	.842	476	9.33	1154	.412	35.0	4.94

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	7.91
4	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	14	2.80	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.73
6	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.65
7	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.12
9	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.39
10	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	3.18
12	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	4.48
14	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.32
18	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	10	2.50	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.66
21	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	6.09
25	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	5.34
31	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.73
36	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.71
39	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.30
44	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	1.42
Total		51	2	22	24	2	0.47	76	1.49	.	.	.	.	.	35.0	4.94