Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	5	.000	1	0	2	0.00	6	.667	18	6.00	70	.257	2.0	3.15
4	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	2	10	-.100	8	3	3	0.60	21	.857	47	9.40	110	.427	5.5	5.48
6	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	7	.286	1	1	1	0.33	8	.875	15	5.00	70	.214	3.0	2.44
7	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	1	12	.167	12	2	3	0.40	23	.870	39	7.80	89	.438	5.5	4.48
9	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	6	.167	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	32	10.67	71	.451	2.5	5.88
10	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	8	.375	6	1	2	0.20	19	.895	53	10.60	106	.500	5.0	6.24
12	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	5	1	2	0.33	12	.833	20	6.67	59	.339	3.0	3.48
13	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	4	0	3	0.00	11	.727	24	8.00	66	.364	1.5	4.06
15	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	5	.200	4	1	3	0.33	10	.700	25	8.33	71	.352	4.0	4.67
18	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	5	.800	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	17	5.67	60	.283	4.0	2.24
21	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	6	.000	4	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	17	5.67	66	.258	1.0	2.52
26	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	7	-.143	7	1	2	0.33	13	.846	22	7.33	66	.333	2.5	4.18
29	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	9	-.111	2	2	1	0.67	9	.889	26	8.67	60	.433	3.5	4.02
33	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	0	9	.444	7	0	5	0.00	17	.706	44	11.00	106	.415	6.0	7.51
34	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	5	1	1	0.33	14	.929	38	12.67	70	.543	3.5	8.82
41	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	2	.500	7	2	0	0.50	17	1.000	41	10.25	120	.342	5.0	6.85
46	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	6	.000	4	1	1	0.33	11	.909	24	8.00	79	.304	2.5	3.90
Total		59	32	0.54	12	107	.187	81	16	30	0.27	218	.862	502	8.51	1339	.375	60.0	4.70

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	9	3.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.15
4	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.48
6	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.44
7	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.48
9	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.88
10	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.24
12	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.48
13	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.06
15	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.67
18	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.24
21	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.52
26	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.18
29	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.02
33	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	7.51
34	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	10	3.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	8.82
41	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	11	2.75	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.85
46	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.90
Total		59	1	22	23	0	0.39	90	1.53	.	.	.	.	.	60.0	4.70