Players

Daniel Anderson 5 Right Side (RS)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	13	14	13	-

Season 8 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
224 70th	.253 236th	25 55th	89 96th	52 130th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	8	40	.175	5	0	3	0.00	15	.800	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.18
2	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	7	33	.212	3	1	1	0.20	14	.929	.	.	.	.	16.5	5.26
4	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	6	35	.171	6	2	1	0.40	17	.941	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.50
5	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	10	.300	0	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.79
7	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	2	12	.083	5	3	0	0.75	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.26
8	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	1	18	.556	4	1	2	0.25	15	.867	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.43
10	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	4	26	.231	6	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.53
11	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	7	20	.050	3	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.04
13	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	9	.111	5	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.12
15	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	6	24	.167	6	2	2	0.40	14	.857	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.42
17	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	13	.231	7	1	3	0.33	13	.769	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.18
19	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	7	26	.192	2	1	4	0.20	11	.636	.	.	.	.	15.0	5.78
21	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	11	41	.122	4	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.48
22	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	17	.235	6	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	8.63
29	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	2	23	.565	5	1	2	0.20	16	.875	.	.	.	.	17.0	5.86
30	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	4	23	.261	4	2	3	0.67	13	.769	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.82
34	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	19	.263	7	2	1	0.50	15	.933	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.92
38	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	22	.273	6	1	1	0.20	15	.933	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.92
39	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	16	.250	9	3	3	1.00	15	.800	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.43
40	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	7	34	.265	5	1	2	0.20	13	.846	.	.	.	.	18.0	5.99
44	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	13	.615	5	2	2	0.67	10	.800	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.93
45	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	4	28	.464	4	1	1	0.20	15	.933	.	.	.	.	20.5	7.70
Total		88	224	2.55	97	502	.253	107	25	38	0.28	288	.868	.	.	.	.	279.0	6.24

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.18
2	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	5.26
4	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.50
5	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	9	3.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.79
7	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.26
8	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.43
10	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	8	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.53
11	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.04
13	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.12
15	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.42
17	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.18
19	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	5.78
21	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.48
22	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	1	1.00	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	8.63
29	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	5.86
30	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.82
34	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.92
38	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0	1	1	0.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.92
39	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.43
40	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0	1	0	0.20	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	5.99
44	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.93
45	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	20.5	7.70
Total		88	8	44	52	3	0.59	89	1.01	.	.	.	.	.	279.0	6.24