Players

Daniel Anderson 5 Right Side (RS)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	13	14	13	-

Season 9 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
152 145th	.328 189th	22 92nd	91 67th	52 118th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	24	.375	10	2	3	0.50	20	.850	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.02
3	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	23	.348	7	2	2	0.67	16	.875	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.37
5	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	13	.077	4	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.77
6	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	14	.214	4	1	2	0.25	12	.833	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.08
8	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	9	.000	8	2	2	0.67	14	.857	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.13
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	9	.222	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.94
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	12	.250	1	1	2	0.33	9	.778	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.42
12	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	4	14	.286	4	1	2	0.20	17	.882	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.22
15	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	9	.444	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.42
16	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	16	.375	3	2	2	0.50	15	.867	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.86
17	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	8	.125	0	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.22
18	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	10	.300	1	1	1	0.20	16	.938	.	.	.	.	7.0	2.50
25	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	6	21	.286	3	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.51
26	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	22	.409	7	1	3	0.33	13	.769	.	.	.	.	14.5	10.00
30	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	11	.364	6	2	0	0.67	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.41
32	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	0	10	.800	2	1	2	0.25	14	.857	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.84
34	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	3	-.333	7	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.08
35	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	11	.273	10	2	3	0.50	20	.850	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.52
39	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	11	.273	7	2	1	0.67	13	.923	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.59
40	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	2	15	.467	10	1	2	0.20	23	.913	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.92
44	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	18	.444	4	0	1	0.00	15	.933	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.29
45	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	1	13	.462	2	0	3	0.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.72
Total		81	152	1.88	55	296	.328	107	22	41	0.27	312	.869	.	.	.	.	202.5	6.17

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.02
3	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.37
5	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.77
6	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.08
8	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.13
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.94
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.42
12	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.22
15	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.42
16	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.86
17	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.22
18	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	2.50
25	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.51
26	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	10.00
30	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	8	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.41
32	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.84
34	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.08
35	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.52
39	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.59
40	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.92
44	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.29
45	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.72
Total		81	5	47	52	6	0.64	91	1.12	.	.	.	.	.	202.5	6.17