Players

Juan Calderon 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	16	15	16	14	12

Career Honors

S101st All-BIG-EAST

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	15	.533	6	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.87
3	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	14	.643	6	2	3	0.67	12	.750	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.20
4	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	1	20	.700	7	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.0	9.29
6	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	14	.429	4	2	2	0.67	10	.800	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.83
10	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	3	21	.524	4	2	0	0.67	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.5	9.64
12	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	4	18	.389	6	2	1	0.67	13	.923	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.67
14	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	12	.500	9	1	2	0.33	17	.882	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.89
16	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	3	26	.500	5	0	2	0.00	17	.882	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.82
17	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	23	5.75	3	29	.690	10	1	1	0.25	21	.952	1	0.25	1	1.000	25.0	8.66
19	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	5	21	.381	8	1	3	0.33	16	.813	0	0.00	1	.000	14.5	8.15
21	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	6	23	.348	14	5	3	1.00	27	.889	0	0.00	1	.000	21.0	7.48
22	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	14	.357	8	2	1	0.50	18	.944	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.24
25	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	3	24	.583	10	1	4	0.20	20	.800	0	0.00	3	.000	20.0	7.57
26	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	15	.467	9	4	2	1.33	15	.867	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.41
30	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	19	3.80	9	29	.345	5	1	1	0.20	15	.933	1	0.20	1	1.000	22.0	7.56
32	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	14	.714	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	0	0.00	2	.000	13.5	8.68
34	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	6	24	.250	7	2	1	0.50	18	.944	1	0.25	1	1.000	16.0	7.51
37	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	3	23	.435	1	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.27
40	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	5	22	.364	1	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	0	0.00	2	.000	15.5	7.09
Total		67	244	3.64	64	378	.476	124	28	28	0.42	283	.901	3	0.04	12	.250	299.0	7.83

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	7	2.60	10	0	1.000	11.0	7.87
3	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	8	2.42	12	0	1.000	13.5	8.20
4	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	4	2.33	9	0	1.000	16.0	9.29
6	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	10	10	0	3.33	5	1.67	10	2.54	13	1	.923	15.0	7.83
10	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	9	3.00	9	2.57	14	0	1.000	17.5	9.64
12	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	3	2.29	7	0	1.000	13.0	7.67
14	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	9	3.00	6	2.50	8	0	1.000	10.0	7.89
16	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	18	2.67	24	0	1.000	16.5	7.82
17	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	7	2.14	14	1	.929	25.0	8.66
19	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	7	2.13	15	1	.933	14.5	8.15
21	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	6	1.20	14	2.52	21	0	1.000	21.0	7.48
22	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	2	0.50	13	2.40	20	0	1.000	12.5	5.24
25	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	4	0.80	11	2.37	19	0	1.000	20.0	7.57
26	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	5	2.38	8	0	1.000	13.5	7.41
30	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	4	0.80	9	2.24	17	1	.941	22.0	7.56
32	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	7	2.60	10	0	1.000	13.5	8.68
34	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	19	2.67	24	1	.958	16.0	7.51
37	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	10	2.24	17	2	.882	13.0	7.27
40	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	4	2.00	12	1	.917	15.5	7.09
Total		67	0	54	54	0	0.81	89	1.33	171	2.42	274	8	.971	299.0	7.83