Players

Albert Castilla 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	16	-	-	16	11

Season 8 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
199 3rd	2.29 39th	.953 42nd	89 77th	10 231st

Career Honors

S92nd All-TMVL1st All-SEC

S103rd All-TMVL1st All-SEC

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	3	1.00	7	.429	0.0	3.63
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	1	0.00	9	.889	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	6.84
5	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	12	.833	2	0.40	8	.250	0.0	7.55
6	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	3	0.00	9	.667	3	0.60	9	.333	0.0	6.38
7	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	1.10
9	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	.400	0.0	5.40
10	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	2	0.33	12	.833	3	1.00	4	.750	1.0	7.61
12	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	1	0.33	2	.500	0.0	6.43
15	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.20	14	.857	7	1.40	9	.778	1.0	6.36
16	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	12	.833	5	1.25	9	.556	0.0	7.85
17	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	5	1.67	9	.556	1.0	10.00
20	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	2	0.33	7	.714	5	1.67	10	.500	1.0	5.95
22	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	1	0.00	18	.944	1	0.25	6	.167	0.0	8.90
26	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	3	0.00	14	.786	7	2.33	12	.583	0.0	7.07
30	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	2	0.00	12	.833	6	1.50	7	.857	0.0	5.78
33	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	0	1	0.00	20	.950	2	0.50	4	.500	0.0	9.30
34	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	2	0.40	16	.875	7	1.40	15	.467	2.0	4.78
35	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	5	0.00	16	.688	3	0.75	8	.375	0.0	5.60
39	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.20	14	.857	7	1.40	9	.778	1.0	6.55
40	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	14	.857	6	1.50	13	.462	0.0	4.83
44	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.25	15	.867	3	0.75	7	.429	1.0	6.10
45	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2	3	0.50	18	.833	5	1.25	8	.625	2.0	7.61
Total		84	.	.	.	.	.	91	10	39	0.12	258	.849	89	1.06	174	.511	10.0	6.44

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	2.04	24	2	.917	0.0	3.63
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	5	2.22	9	0	1.000	0.0	6.84
5	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	19	2.62	26	0	1.000	0.0	7.55
6	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	13	2.60	10	2.21	19	1	.947	0.0	6.38
7	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	2	1.67	9	1	.889	0.0	1.10
9	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	7	2.20	15	0	1.000	0.0	5.40
10	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	7	2.36	11	1	.909	1.0	7.61
12	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	8	2.27	15	0	1.000	0.0	6.43
15	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	17	2.48	25	1	.960	1.0	6.36
16	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	11	2.53	17	0	1.000	0.0	7.85
17	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	9	2.67	12	0	1.000	1.0	10.00
20	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	11	2.24	17	2	.882	1.0	5.95
22	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	10	2.57	14	0	1.000	0.0	8.90
26	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	2	1.78	9	1	.889	0.0	7.07
30	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	8	2.00	18	1	.944	0.0	5.78
33	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	16	4.00	6	2.36	11	0	1.000	0.0	9.30
34	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	9	2.04	24	2	.917	2.0	4.78
35	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	10	2.19	21	1	.952	0.0	5.60
39	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	12	2.61	18	0	1.000	1.0	6.55
40	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	10	2.40	20	1	.950	0.0	4.83
44	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	10	2.27	15	2	.867	1.0	6.10
45	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	8	2.31	13	1	.923	2.0	7.61
Total		84	.	.	.	.	.	199	2.37	201	2.29	362	17	.953	10.0	6.44