Players

Career Honors

S92nd All-TMVL1st All-SEC

S103rd All-TMVL1st All-SEC

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	21	5	0	1.67	26	1.000	5	1.67	6	.833	5.0	7.86
3	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	2	0.33	12	.833	2	0.67	4	.500	1.0	8.48
4	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	1	0	0.33	17	1.000	6	2.00	10	.600	1.0	7.65
6	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	6	2.00	8	.750	1.0	8.19
7	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	2	0.67	7	.286	0.0	7.13
9	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	0	0.50	17	1.000	3	0.75	8	.375	2.0	8.68
11	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.33	12	.833	2	0.67	3	.667	1.0	4.72
12	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	0	0.33	13	1.000	6	2.00	8	.750	1.0	10.00
13	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	17	.882	6	1.20	8	.750	0.0	8.06
16	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.20	17	.882	1	0.20	2	.500	1.0	7.43
17	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	3	1	0.75	17	.941	6	1.50	9	.667	3.0	7.31
18	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	1	0.33	10	.900	1	0.33	1	1.000	1.0	6.24
21	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	3	0.00	15	.800	4	0.80	6	.667	0.0	5.55
26	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	1	3	0.33	19	.842	2	0.67	5	.400	1.0	7.63
29	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	3	0.20	16	.813	4	0.80	8	.500	1.0	7.18
33	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	1	0.00	15	.933	4	0.80	5	.800	0.0	6.95
34	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	3	1.00	3	1.000	0.0	5.95
39	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.33	11	.818	1	0.33	2	.500	1.0	9.59
46	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	2	0.50	15	.867	2	0.50	6	.333	2.0	5.95
Total		70	.	.	.	.	.	115	22	28	0.31	276	.899	66	0.94	109	.606	22.0	7.40

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	3	2.50	4	0	1.000	5.0	7.86
3	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	15	2.72	18	0	1.000	1.0	8.48
4	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	7	2.29	14	0	1.000	1.0	7.65
6	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	10	2.62	13	0	1.000	1.0	8.19
7	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	9	2.31	13	1	.923	0.0	7.13
9	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.75	11	2.31	16	1	.938	2.0	8.68
11	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	8	1.88	17	2	.882	1.0	4.72
12	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	5	2.57	7	0	1.000	1.0	10.00
13	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	10	2.53	15	0	1.000	0.0	8.06
16	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	12	2.47	19	0	1.000	1.0	7.43
17	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	5	2.30	10	0	1.000	3.0	7.31
18	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	2.58	12	0	1.000	1.0	6.24
21	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	12	2.22	18	3	.833	0.0	5.55
26	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	5	2.00	11	1	.909	1.0	7.63
29	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	14	2.41	22	1	.955	1.0	7.18
33	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	16	2.36	25	1	.960	0.0	6.95
34	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	7	2.27	11	2	.818	0.0	5.95
39	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	8	2.46	13	0	1.000	1.0	9.59
46	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	9	2.14	14	2	.857	2.0	5.95
Total		70	.	.	.	.	.	165	2.36	174	2.36	272	14	.949	22.0	7.40