Players

Career Honors

S92nd All-TMVL1st All-SEC

S103rd All-TMVL1st All-SEC

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	1	0.00	11	.909	5	1.67	8	.625	0.0	9.21
3	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	7.79
5	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	4	0	1.33	18	1.000	0	0.00	2	.000	4.0	9.14
6	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	3	2	1.00	15	.867	0	0.00	2	.000	3.0	7.88
8	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	5	2	1.67	18	.889	3	1.00	4	.750	5.0	6.76
9	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	2	3	0.40	19	.842	6	1.20	11	.545	2.0	3.96
10	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	11	.636	0.0	3.65
12	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	11	.727	0.0	8.51
13	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	5	1.67	6	.833	1.0	6.55
14	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	3	0.20	18	.833	5	1.00	8	.625	1.0	5.23
17	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	14	1	2	0.33	22	.909	5	1.67	9	.556	1.0	6.51
18	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	2	3	0.67	20	.850	0	0.00	1	.000	2.0	8.39
22	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	2	0.00	16	.875	7	1.40	13	.538	0.0	7.83
25	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	1	2	0.25	19	.895	6	1.50	7	.857	1.0	6.42
29	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	3	0	1.00	19	1.000	3	1.00	7	.429	3.0	9.75
30	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	4	0.00	16	.750	5	1.25	11	.455	0.0	9.08
34	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	1.0	5.65
39	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	5	.800	0.0	6.48
44	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	2	4	0.40	22	.818	7	1.40	10	.700	2.0	8.36
45	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2	2	0.40	23	.913	3	0.60	9	.333	2.0	5.93
Total		76	.	.	.	.	.	131	28	33	0.37	281	.883	82	1.08	139	.590	28.0	7.15

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	2	2.40	5	0	1.000	0.0	9.21
3	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	14	4.67	7	2.16	19	0	1.000	0.0	7.79
5	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	16	5.33	6	2.36	14	0	1.000	4.0	9.14
6	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	8	2.50	12	0	1.000	3.0	7.88
8	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	13	2.50	18	0	1.000	5.0	6.76
9	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	8	2.05	21	2	.905	2.0	3.96
10	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	13	2.25	24	1	.958	0.0	3.65
12	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	6	2.44	9	0	1.000	0.0	8.51
13	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	2.50	10	1	.900	1.0	6.55
14	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	18	2.27	30	3	.900	1.0	5.23
17	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	3	1.79	14	1	.929	1.0	6.51
18	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	15	2.64	22	0	1.000	2.0	8.39
22	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	13	2.60	14	2.40	25	0	1.000	0.0	7.83
25	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	10	2.12	25	1	.960	1.0	6.42
29	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	9	2.46	13	0	1.000	3.0	9.75
30	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	14	2.62	21	0	1.000	0.0	9.08
34	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	11	2.28	18	1	.944	1.0	5.65
39	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	14	2.68	19	0	1.000	0.0	6.48
44	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	16	3.20	12	2.32	19	2	.895	2.0	8.36
45	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	14	2.40	25	1	.960	2.0	5.93
Total		76	.	.	.	.	.	189	2.49	204	2.35	363	13	.964	28.0	7.15