Players

Steve Radinsky 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	16	15	14	12	7

Season 10 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
332 15th	.355 160th	33 26th	98 51st	62 76th

Career Honors

S92nd All-PAC-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	23	.478	6	3	1	0.75	17	.941	2	0.50	2	1.000	17.5	7.86
2	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	19	.526	4	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.89
4	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	17	5.67	3	27	.519	9	1	1	0.33	15	.933	1	0.33	1	1.000	18.5	8.50
5	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	8	37	.162	7	1	2	0.25	18	.889	0	0.00	1	.000	17.0	8.09
7	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	0	18	.611	7	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.79
8	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	19	3.80	6	28	.464	9	3	0	0.60	19	1.000	.	.	.	.	23.5	7.99
10	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	2	22	.545	7	4	2	0.80	19	.895	1	0.20	2	.500	19.5	6.99
11	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	25	.400	5	2	1	0.67	11	.909	0	0.00	1	.000	15.5	7.80
13	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	18	4.50	6	33	.364	6	2	0	0.50	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	21.0	8.08
14	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	20	5.00	7	40	.325	5	4	2	1.00	16	.875	.	.	.	.	25.0	7.84
17	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	20	4.00	7	34	.382	2	0	1	0.00	14	.929	0	0.00	1	.000	22.0	7.87
18	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	6	31	.355	7	2	0	0.50	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	21.0	8.84
21	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	3	19	.579	8	2	1	0.67	15	.933	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.76
22	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	14	-.071	3	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	5.0	1.73
25	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	7	21	.048	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.18
26	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	19	4.75	3	27	.593	4	1	3	0.25	14	.786	.	.	.	.	21.5	9.11
29	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	10	26	-.192	7	2	2	0.50	16	.875	2	0.50	3	.667	8.5	3.50
31	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	8	18	.056	5	3	2	1.00	12	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	13.5	6.46
34	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	22	.364	3	0	2	0.00	12	.833	1	0.25	1	1.000	14.0	5.93
36	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	26	5.20	9	51	.333	4	2	2	0.40	17	.882	.	.	.	.	29.5	8.80
39	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	1	24	.625	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	0	0.00	1	.000	17.5	7.44
41	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	3	20	.350	11	0	3	0.00	23	.870	0	0.00	1	.000	10.5	4.87
44	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	25	.320	4	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.61
46	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	22	.364	4	0	3	0.00	15	.800	1	0.25	1	1.000	13.0	5.89
Total		91	332	3.65	110	626	.355	130	33	36	0.36	344	.895	9	0.10	17	.529	397.5	7.28

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	10	2.50	16	1	.938	17.5	7.86
2	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	10	2.83	12	0	1.000	12.5	8.89
4	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	4	2.00	13	1	.923	18.5	8.50
5	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	16	2.59	22	0	1.000	17.0	8.09
7	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	11	2.50	18	0	1.000	12.5	8.79
8	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	12	2.35	20	1	.950	23.5	7.99
10	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	6	1.20	17	2.52	25	1	.960	19.5	6.99
11	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	8	2.13	15	2	.867	15.5	7.80
13	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	14	2.32	25	1	.960	21.0	8.08
14	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	10	2.05	19	3	.842	25.0	7.84
17	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	6	1.20	14	2.38	21	0	1.000	22.0	7.87
18	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	7	1.75	10	2.29	17	2	.882	21.0	8.84
21	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	8	2.67	10	2.56	16	0	1.000	17.0	9.76
22	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.79	14	3	.786	5.0	1.73
25	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	14	2.56	18	1	.944	9.0	6.18
26	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	12	2.58	19	0	1.000	21.5	9.11
29	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	9	2.05	22	2	.909	8.5	3.50
31	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	10	2.06	18	2	.889	13.5	6.46
34	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	5	1.25	9	2.05	19	3	.842	14.0	5.93
36	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	16	2.64	25	0	1.000	29.5	8.80
39	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	4	1.89	9	1	.889	17.5	7.44
41	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	13	2.43	21	1	.952	10.5	4.87
44	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	9	2.29	21	0	1.000	13.0	7.61
46	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	8	2.12	17	1	.941	13.0	5.89
Total		91	3	59	62	3	0.68	98	1.08	256	2.33	442	26	.941	397.5	7.28